PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES (SPVT) - strategic documents
PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE
PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:
Biblical Gospels of Jesus as a religion of love (charity), Philosophy of Balance as the science of love and the law as applied science of the science of love (charity)
The Philosophy of Balance is the science of love (charity), therefore it is based at least 51 percent on Jesus' biblical Gospels, which should be a religion of love (charity) and on which should be based mainly Christianity, but up to 49% on other areas of human knowledge, which contain also scientific knowledge about love (charity). Democratic law should then be mainly the applied science of the science of love (charity), therefore the science of love (charity) is more important within the application of law than a mechanical interpretation of legal provisions. In other words it is always necessary to solve every legal problem from the point of view of scientific knowledge about love (charity) at the beginning and from the point of view of a specific legal provision later.
My text on the www.spvzt.cz and on the mentioned webs is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported, unless stated specifically otherwise.
If you are citizen of the Czech Republic, please sign the Petition for the formation of political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures, that all living creatures have in our society just rights recognized under state law. This can be done on http://www.spvzt.cz/Peticezavznikstrany.html . (* Signature for the Petition does not mean the emergence of party membership.)
The ultimate aim of the activity of the political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures is the establishment of peace among all living creatures, inter alia between carnivores and herbivores, herbivores and plants. to achieve the ideal of paradise, in a world by their own power of the people and all living creatures in their life. This goal represents the task reachable only with the progress of science, or with the continuing evolution of nature in an endless time, and inter alia it will eventually require a ban on any intentional killing of all animals, especially animals and plants and fungi by any person for the purpose of consumption and the consumption only of the bodies of living creatures, in particular animals deceased at this ban, in principle, only of old age.
We cannot want from others' welfare in childhood, middle age and old, and to kill unnecessarily other living creatures for our convenience or taste resulting in a contradiction or conflict of conscience in the brain of an individual, especially of a human and according to the Philosophy of Balance it is the root cause of all wars, murders, diseases, immoral behavior and of other cruelty and mercilessness in the society of living creatures.
Reason to the Philosophy of Balance and to the law on the slaughter tax
According to the majority opinion the human is the supreme predator in nature, and therefore he or she has the right to kill other living creatures, in particular I mean the animals, insects and plants or fungi, and even though perhaps the human does not like it nor he or she admits it publicly, the human must respect the fact, that in nature strong, often unmerciful predators govern and the human as the supreme predator must arrange also his or her life according to it. Human does not need allegedly care about the good of all creation, but just for the good of his or her own pack also at the expense of great death and pain of other packs of living creatures, the human can allegedly approve and cause much more than the least possible death and pain. Thus the human has allegedly the right to be also unmerciful. This is partly proved by the historical tradition of humanity and by nature observations, especially by the Darwinian evolution theory, although exact science has not provided the perfect exact scientific proof of this up to now.
Conversely according to the Philosophy of Balance in nature is valid the law of the exclusive harmony, i.e. symbiosis, i.e. the in long term most powerful law of love (defined in an obvious way in my Philosophy of Balance, that "All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain. All the rest consists more in views (speculations).). This is based on my scientific hypothesis that according to the Philosophy of Balance, living microorganisms, especially living cells, are capable of distinguishing and remembering whether we protect them, especially by feeding them, or whether we kill them. Therefore, even these living microorganisms, according to the Philosophy of Balance, are able through basic mental reflections to distinguish between and remember their friend or enemy. It could be said, that they possess a soul in the religious sense of the term. An adversarial living microorganism is then treated as an enemy by not only these living organisms but also by their affiliated or related microorganisms, which devour it. In our macro-world, this tends to manifest as quarrel, illness, pain, war, injury, disaster, failure, death, etc. A friendly living organism, according to the Philosophy of Balance, is then treated in an amicable manner by these living microorganisms, or, more precisely, it is not devoured by them. On the contrary, they devour such living microorganisms that attempt to devour the amicable one. The friendly behaviour of the microorganisms manifests itself in the macro-world as the peaceful and long life of me and my offspring or as a series of friends and comrades who are willing to fight and sacrifice their lives for us. In my Philosophy of Balance I am also trying to find exact natural science proofs for this hypothesis.
If my Philosophy of Balance is valid, then every living creature in nature and also the human as the supreme predator in nature are paid off in long term to be still as little as possible predator, i.e. to cause still the least possible death and pain, or at least still not to cause much more than the least possible death and pain. If the human society wishes to humanize further, then it can be assumed that in the future the enactment of by me proposed slaughter tax happens most certainly, unless human society humanizes further, then this will apparently not happen.
The main in everyday life practical biblical question: Is nature unmerciful or the biblical paradise for all alive can be achieved in it by own forces of living creatures?
LAW ON THE SLAUGHTER TAX
The practical functioning of the slaughter tax will be based on the finances. At least half of the revenue of the slaughter tax, will be by this Act specifically intended to subsidies to farmers and to the transition and to maintain their agricultural production on animal breeding until their natural death, for the production of the products from sanitary treated and safe bodies of naturally dead animals, including food, in particular meat. The following products from naturally dead animals will continue to benefit from the fact that they will not be the subject of the slaughter tax, compared to products from slaughtered animals. The moral aspect will also work as the prevention of reduction of the slaughter tax, because payment of the slaughter tax will be so a sort of indulgence of the people, that they are complicit with intentional killing of an animal. Among other things, one tenth rate of the slaughter tax for goods from organic farms, because they are more merciful, and further exclusion, where appropriate, or exemption from slaughter tax of the family home breeds of livestock also for the purpose of slaughter of 133 kilograms of body weight of the animal for a member of the household and a year, because those members of home breeds have towards bred animals fundamentally personal relationship on the basis of personal care for farm animals as family members, as opposed to the agricultural factory farms of animals for the purpose of slaughter, causing the worst suffering of the animals. The same tax rate for organic farming and livestock delivered to the home family farms has to prioritize the education of these farm animals from the baby, when at the time of taxation at the time of the supply of this animal to the home breed this animal has a minimum mass than an adult animal. At least half of the revenue of the slaughter tax will be also by the Act on the slaughter tax tied purposely for subsidies to organic agricultural also slaughter breeds. The second most half of the tax will be also by the Act on the slaughter tax tied purposely to help people in extreme need in our country and in the world.
Officials of the Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures will have to be members of the Society of Friends, i.e. friends of all living creatures and to comply with the eternal obligation of all living creatures, otherwise they lose their office without further.
Eternal duty of all living creatures
(1) Fundamental duty of all living creatures is to cause the least possible death and pain. The perfect living creature eats then only plant fruits and plant seeds from all living creatures. (Further also eternal duty of members).
(2) Any change of this eternal duty of all living creatures, who are members of this association (further also members), is inadmissible. In the event of any change or nullification of this eternal duty of members the extinction of association occurs automatically.
(3) By the interpretation of these articles it is impossible to entitle any elimination or threat of this eternal duty of members.
(4) Member has right also to eat only gradually in extreme emergency (especially from serious health reasons) eggs, in extreme emergency carrions of living creatures died of natural causes, on principle of old age, or in extreme emergency collected blood of non-slaughtered animals and humans and milk, or in extreme emergency plants, all always the most mercifully as possible bred and killed, and products purely from them.Up