www.spvzt.cz

BOOKLET OF THE PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES

(philosophical experiment)

 

 

Among other things the award: „The Most Merciful Products“.

http://www.centipedia.com/images/en/8/88/AdamAndEve_fx.png

 

My text on the www.spvzt.cz and on the mentioned webs is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported, unless stated specifically otherwise.

4th edition, Copyleft 2012-2014

We cannot survive without cadavers (elsewhere in my writings possibly also as without meat) of animals!

We want only the merciful organic meat! (see 7. Interview with Hare Krishna-an important Hindu organization and Hindus about eating meat and carnivores )

Slaughter factory farming are animal concentration camps!
The slaughter tax contributes to the change of factory farming to organic farming.
The slaughter tax will help people in dire need.

(All quotations from the Bible in this book because of copyright are on principle in Czech from Kralice Bible see http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~rovnanim/bible/k/1K15.php , originally all inspired by the Bible Old and New Testaments | including deuterocanonic books |, Czech ecumenical translation, CZECH Bible Society, 1995, see www.biblenet.cz ,  in English from King James Version http://www.biblegateway.com/ )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE LECTURES ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE

(Lecturer - JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., author of the work):

1. Individual lectures through video call via skype on line: daliborgruza , where appropriate, also with the translation to your language, it is possible to arrange them GRATIS for at least 5 serious interested present persons + possible reward for a translator from the Czech language at the contacts listed below.


2. Topics of lectures are about 60 minutes including discussion:


a) PB in relation to diseases, medicine and experiments on animals,
 

b) PB and marriage and children,

c) PB and politics (especially Nazism, Stalinism, democracy and the future of democracy), 

d) PB and ethical breeding of dogs and cats and agricultural industrial slaughter factory farms, 

e) PB and ethics (in particular, how we should act in every moment of our life, by what we should be managed), 

f) PB and mystique (in particular from the perspective of contemporary scientific projection of philosophical pantheism and subjective idealism), 

g) PB and physics (especially from the view of the mechanical model of the reality as the mechanical movement of the points of spacetime), 

h) PB and mathematics in particular, from the perspective of counting with zero and infinity, 

ch) PB and the slaughter tax and political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures, 

i) PB and the Devil, virtually an absolute vacuum,

j) PB and God (is it necessary 100% belief in God, or is less belief enough, in what we must believe in 100%),

k) PB and the army and physical training, 

l) PB and the possibility of the biblical paradise in our world, 

m) PB and symbiotic agriculture, 

n) PB and the law of karma, 

o) PB and unmerciful, especially animal products,

p) PB and psychology (in particular the law of balance, both long term and in casual conversation, at which we feel well as much as possible), 

q) PB and aesthetics (in particular perfectly infinitely complex beauty), 

r) PB and "an impossibility" of vegetarianism in particular from the perspective of Hinduism, 

q) PB and law (in particular, the social contract of all living creatures and the "good" attorney at law), 

t) PB and Judaism and Islam,

u) PB and Christianity,

v) PB and economics (especially the burning of cadavers, virtually of organic matter and the law of success),

w) PB and Darwinism (Darwin's struggle for life in the nature throughout the food chain as the worst possible solution),

x) PB and language


or on any specific topic, which is the subject of the Philosophy of Balance.


Contacts:

Tel. 00420 534 008 871 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting  end_of_the_skype_highlighting, Tel. 00420 606 302 812 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting, skype online: daliborgruza , e-mai: zakladatel@spvzt.cz

Content

Introduction … 3

The lectures on the Philosophy of Balance … 4

Political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures … 6

About us … 7

The Statute of SPVŽT and Articles of civil association Society of Friends … 9

Film: "The Philosophy of Balance and the slaughter tax. Is natures evolution merciful" (with experts opinions) … 21

Books:  Philosophy of Balance … 22
            Secondary School Philosophy of Balance … 25

Symbiotic agriculture and experiments of natural science proving Philosophy of Balance … 26

Discussion on the political orientation of SPVŽT … 28

1. Position of Philosophy of Balance on Judeo-Christian morality of today’s democratic society  … 28

2. And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer the other … 29

3. How are different and how are the same Nazism and Philosophy of Balance … 30

4. Position of Philosophy of Balance on Nazism and Stalinism … 32

5. Discussion with some members of my former Green Party … 33

6. Why are agricultural slaughter factory farms today's concentration camps of animals … 33

7. Interview with Hare Krishna-an important Hindu organization and Hindus about eating meat and carnivores … 34

8. Merciful diet of woman – mother and child during pregnancy and breastfeeding … 37

9. Prognosis of the future of World politics and of political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures … 43

10. The legal rights of viruses, bacteria and parasites in general, by SPVŽT … 44

11. Good adviser, or solicitor and his or her client … 45

12. The question of Judaism from the viewpoint of Philosophy of Balance … 45

13. Romany politics according to the Philosophy of Balance … 47

14. Educational politics according to the Philosophy of Balance … 49

15. Collective responsibility and vaccination against viruses … 49

16. Whom did I vote in the parliamentary elections in October 2013 … 51

17. Why to participate in, virtually not to avoid politics! … 54

18. Differences and sameness in objective value of all living creatures … 55

19. Position of Philosophy of Balance on racism … 55

20. Whom would I vote in municipal elections in Hustopeče 2014 … 56

PETTION for the adoption of the draft of the LAW ON THE SLAUGHTER TAX … 57

1. Draft of Act on the slaughter tax … 57
2. Links to the text … 66
3. The explanatory memorandum to the draft on the slaughter tax … 67

4. Interview: Meat tax-utopia or solution? … 69
5. Interview II. Meat tax-utopia or solution? … 71
6. Interview: Meat tax - change of name to the slaughter tax … 73
7. Vegetarian.cz presents … 74

PETITION NECESSARY FOR THE FORMATION OF THE POLIT. PARTY … 75

Gain GRATIS trade design of rightness:“THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS” … 77

1. The award-won most merciful products-a list: … 77

1.1 Cadavers dying naturally, principally of the old age, from home poultry farms for diet of the dogs or cats, possibly human … 77

1.2 Plant fertilizer made only from meat and bone meal from the cadavers of naturally died, i.e. not slaughtered animals … 78

1.3 Potatoes from symbiotic agriculture … 79

2. The statute of the association – introduction … 79

3. The statute of the association – rules for wining award of the most merciful products … 80

Contact (T. G. Masaryk’s house) … 82

Useful links … 83

Appendix: Philosophy of Balance or ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY as biblical paradise in the world for all living creatures by our own forces as commentary on Bible, Genesis, chapter 1-4 … 84

english osn English corrected translation and best in Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox multilingual mechanical translations from English on http://www.spvzt.cz/SPVZTbooklet.html or http://spvzt.sweb.cz/SPVZTbooklet.html  

About newly being established new political

PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES

(SPVŽT)

Founder: JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.

PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE

PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:

„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other,

therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain."

All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

 

raj

www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz

( http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/default.asp , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , http://youtu.be/YhOv47fQlRU , http://youtu.be/ibV-Fwh4sUc , www.e-polis.cz )

My text on the www.spvzt.cz and on the above mentioned webs is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported, unless stated specifically otherwise.

About us

deska

SPVŽT has a program to create a humanistic society on principles of mercy and justice just for all living creatures, in particular of our State regardless of species.

The first objective of SPVŽT is to promote the Act on the slaughter tax. The aim of the Bill is to tax and thus limit needless slaughters of animals and, by implication, the suffering of animals caused by the slaughters. The problem is that, on principle, these animals are slaughtered at a very young age, after having experienced fattening solely for the purposes of the slaughter, often under very merciless conditions. The Slaughter Tax Bill supposes the exclusion of this slaughter tax for health, welfare and other reasons.  Details are modified in this bill proposal, including the rules for using the revenue raised by this tax to support farmers in their transition to a different – more merciful method of agricultural production. Furthermore, the Bill supposes, that these financial means will be used for public welfare projects, so that the money raised from death is simply used for saving life. There are two great risks involved in this Slaughter Tax Bill from the point of view of the above-mentioned evolutionary hypothesis on the friendship and animosity of microorganisms. First, the slaughter tax rate might be set too high, resulting in the forced reduction of the number of kept farm animals. Second, the slaughter tax rate might be set too low, failing to provide sufficient encouragement and consideration to the gradual transition of all living creatures to an increasingly merciful method of nourishment and therefore life as such, as argued by the present hypothesis on the mercy of nature’s evolution. One of the solutions to these risks is the fact, that animals not killed intentionally by a human, i.e. those that died exclusively of old age, will not be subject to taxation within the Slaughter Tax Bill. Such dead animals could, under medical supervision and in compliance with valid animal cruelty laws, be produced by large-scale agricultural production. They would be used as food for carnivorous animals kept by humans or for those humans who cannot do without meat and have chosen this type of food for ethical reasons. This Bill will help balance the interests of carnivores and herbivores, without forcing a total transition to vegetarian food on the carnivores, something, that most of them would probably not survive in a good health.

The practical functioning of the slaughter tax will be based on the finances. At least half of the revenue of the slaughter tax, will be by this Act specifically intended to subsidies to farmers and to the transition and to maintain their agricultural production on animal breeding until their natural death, for the production of the products from bodies of naturally dead animals, including food, in particular meat. The following products from naturally dead animals will continue to benefit from the fact that they will not be the subject of the slaughter tax, compared to products from slaughtered animals. The moral aspect will also work as the prevention of reduction of the slaughter tax, because payment of the slaughter tax will be so a sort of indulgence of the people, that they are complicit with intentional killing of an animal.

 

THE SLAUGHTER TAX IS DRASTICALLY PENALISING THE AGRICULTURAL FACTORY FARMS FOR SLAUGHTER OF LIVESTOCK-TODAY'S CONCENTRATION CAMPS CAUSING THE WORST SUFFERING OF ANIMALS AS OPPOSED TO THE FAMILY HOME ANIMAL AND THE ECOLOGICAL ANIMAL BREEDS ALSO FOR THE PURPOSE OF SLAUGHTER AND TO HELP PEOPLE IN EXTREME NEED IN OUR COUNTRY AND IN THE WORLD.

 

Among other things, one tenth rate of the slaughter tax for goods from organic farms, because they are more merciful, and further exclusion, where appropriate, or exemption from slaughter tax of the family home breeds of livestock also for the purpose of slaughter of 133 kilograms of body weight of the animal for a member of the household and a year, because those members of home breeds have towards bred animals fundamentally personal relationship on the basis of personal care for farm animals as family members, as opposed to the agricultural factory farms of animals for the purpose of slaughter, causing the worst suffering of the animals.

 
The same tax rate for organic farming and livestock delivered to the home family farms has to prioritize the education of these farm animals from the baby, when at the time of taxation at the time of the supply of this animal to the home breed this animal has a minimum mass than an adult animal.

 
At least half of the revenue of the slaughter tax will be also by the Act on the slaughter tax tied purposely for subsidies to organic agricultural also slaughter breeds. The second most half of the tax will be also by the Act on the slaughter tax tied purposely to help people in extreme need in our country and in the world.

 

The ultimate aim of the activity of the political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures is the establishment of peace among all living creatures, inter alia between carnivores and herbivores, herbivores and plants. to achieve the ideal of paradise, in a world by their own power of the  people and all living creatures in their life. This goal represents the task reachable only with the progress of science, or with the continuing evolution of nature in an endless time, and inter alia it will eventually require a ban on any intentional killing of all animals, especially animals and plants and fungi by any person for the purpose of consumption and the consumption only of the bodies of living creatures, in particular animals deceased at this ban, in principle, only of old age.

 

 

The Statute of SPVŽT

The Statute of the political party

THE PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES

“politics should be reasonable and moral” ... “The law of love applies to society and State as much as to the family. All reasonable and honest politics are the implementation of humanism inside and outside.”

Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk, the first Czechoslovak president

ČAPEK, Karel. Talks with T. G. Masaryk. 1. Summary publication. Prague: Československý spisovatel, 1990. 592 pages. Writings, volume 20.

Abbreviation: SPVŽT

Title I.

General provisions

1. The Party for the Rights of All living Creatures is a political party in accordance with the Act on Association in political parties and movements no. 424/91 Collection, as amended. It uses the abbreviation SPVŽT.

2. The SPVŽT carries out its activities throughout the territory of the Czech Republic.

3. The seat of the headquarters is Hustopeče, Dobrovského 56/7 (House not far from the central square, in which the first Czechoslovak President T.G. Masaryk lived in the years 1861-1863).

4. The SPVŽT program is to create a humanistic society on principles of mercy and justice for all living creatures, in particular of our State regardless of species.

5. The first objective of SPVŽT is to promote the Act on slaughter tax. The aim of the Bill is to tax and thus limit needless slaughters of animals and, by implication, the suffering of animals caused by the slaughters. The problem is that, on principle, these animals are slaughtered at a very young age, after having experienced fattening solely for the purposes of the slaughter, often under very merciless conditions. The Slaughter Tax Bill supposes the exclusion of this slaughter, tax for health, welfare and other reasons.  Details are modified in this bill proposal, including the rules for using the revenue raised by this tax to support farmers in their transition to a different – more merciful method of agricultural production. Furthermore, the Bill supposes, that these financial means will be used for public welfare projects, so that the money raised from death is simply used for saving life. There are two great risks involved in this Slaughter Tax Bill from the point of view of the above-mentioned evolutionary hypothesis on the friendship and animosity of microorganisms. First, the slaughter tax rate might be set too high, resulting in the forced reduction of the number of kept farm animals. Second, the slaughter tax rate might be set too low, failing to provide sufficient encouragement and consideration to the gradual transition of all living creatures to an increasingly merciful method of nourishment and therefore life as such, as argued by the present hypothesis on the mercy of nature’s evolution. One of the solutions to these risks is the fact, that animals not killed intentionally by a human, i.e. those that died exclusively of old age, will not be subject to taxation within the Slaughter Tax Bill. Such dead animals could, under medical supervision and in compliance with valid animal cruelty laws, be produced by large-scale agricultural production. They would be used as food for carnivorous animals kept by humans or for those humans who cannot do without meat and have chosen this type of food for ethical reasons. This Bill will help balance the interests of carnivores and herbivores, without forcing a total transition to vegetarian food on the carnivores, something, that most of them would probably not survive in a good health.

6. In deciding on its affairs SPVŽT is governed at all levels by the Democratic majority principle. The resolution becomes valid:

(a) in the presence of the over - half  number of Members of Republic Congress, of the Republic Convention, the Regional Organization, the Republic Conciliation and Arbitration Commission, the Revision Commission, and for it an absolute majority of votes of the present members, except for the below mentioned decisions of the Congress,

(b) for it an absolute majority of the present members shall vote.

(c) in the presence of the over - half number of democratically elected members of the Congress, and for it the votes of at least the three-fifth majority of the present members at the cancellation of the decision of the Honorary Chairman of the SPVŽT about the dissolution of SPVŽT,

(d) in the presence of the over - half number of democratically elected members of the Congress, and for it the votes of at least three-fifth the majority of the present members at the change, including the removal or replacement of this Statute,

(e) in the presence of the over - half number of democratically elected members of the Congress, and for it at least a two-thirds majority votes of the present members for the election and dismissal of the Honorary President of the SPVŽT.

7. The elections on the various levels of SPVŽT are subject to approved electoral regulations of the competent authority.

8. In pursuing the program SPVŽT collaborates with other subjects with the close program, and that in the field of internal and Foreign Affairs.

 

Title II.

Membership

A member of the SPVŽT can be any citizen of the Czech Republic over 18 years, regardless of nationality, race and religion, and he or she confirms with his or her signature on the Member application form that he or she agrees with the program and Statute of SPVŽT.

1. Membership shall be on the date of the decision of the Local Organization (MO), Regional Council (KR) or of the Convention (RS).

2. In the case of rejection of membership in the SPVŽT MO must include the reason for the refusal. The citizen has the right to appeal in writing to the nearest higher authority within 30 days after receiving of the decision.

3. Membership shall lapse:

(a) resignation of a member on the basis of performance of written notification,

(b) the abolition of the membership for harming the interests of SPVŽT and dishonest conduct,

(c) non - payment of contributions for a period of one year,

(e) death,

(f) to discontinue the membership in SPVŽT is possible at the request of a member, if there are compelling reasons to do so.

 

Title III.

The rights and obligations of members

All party members have the same rights and obligations regardless of race, religion, age, or gender.

1. The Member shall have the right:

(a) to be informed about what is happening inside the SPVŽT,

(b) to participate in the negotiations of the member meetings and to joint activities, of which he or she is a member of,

(c) to express freely an opinion on the work of all the bodies and officials of the SPVŽT,

(d) to submit suggestions, questions, or complaints to the authorities of the SPVŽT on which the competent authority is obliged to reply in writing within 30 days,

(e) to vote, elect, propose and be elected to functions within the SPVŽT and to be proposed as the candidate for the representative and legislative bodies,

(f) to appeal against the decision to a higher party authority – appeal must be in writing,

(g) to participate in the meetings of any of the authority of the SPVŽT, which relates to his or her person (the written invitation).

2. The Member is obliged to:

(a) to follow the program, Statute and other party documents in his or her action,

(b) to apply the politics of SPVŽT,

(c) to perform the obligations arising from membership and functions in SPVŽT,

(d) to pay proper fees of at least 100,- CZK annually, with the option of paying quarterly, semi-annually or annually.

 3. Disciplinary measures:

According to the gravity of the facts can be made:

(a) admonition,

(b) the revocation of the function – by the competent or superior authority,

(c) SPVŽT-membership cancellation by the authority which received the Member, or a superior authority,

(d) suspension of membership.

Member has the right to appeal within 15 days of the delivery to the nearest higher authority which must respond within 30 days.

 

Title IV.

The organizational structure of the SPVŽT

1. The President and Executive Vice-President are the statutory representatives of the SPVŽT.

2. The highest decision-making authority of the party is the Republic Congress of SPVŽT.

3. The highest decision-making authority of the party between congresses is the Republic Convention (RS).

4. The executive body of the Republic Convention is Executive Committee (VV).

5. The Chairman of the VV is the President of the party.

6. The Republic Congress elects Republic Revision Commission (RRK) and Republic Conciliation and Arbitration Commission (hereinafter referred to as RSRK).

7. In places where MO are not established, appointees to support election campaigns can arise from the ranks of supporters of party.

8. Honorary President

 

Title V.

Local organization

1. Basic organizational unit of SPVŽT is a local organization (hereinafter referred to as MO), which is made up of the voluntary decision of the members.

2. MO has its registered office in the municipality or city where its members live. If necessary, and in the case of the frequency the citizens of the more localities may be brought together into one.

3. MO may be formed if at least 3 members of the constituting meeting decide. MO is formed from the date of the constituent meeting after the approval of the Regional Council.

4. MO is controlled by its Committee, which is elected by the constituent or the annual meeting usually for a period of two years.

5. MO is leading a proper account of its members and member contributions.

6. MO shall elect and dismiss officials at the local level.

7. The Committee is generally a three-man in the positions: Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer.

8. Member meetings are held as needed at least four times a year. Once a year, the annual meeting of members is held.

9. Meetings shall be convened by the Chairman in accordance with the action plans, or from another urgent reason, if so requested by at least 1/3 of the members. Meetings may also be convened by the higher party authority.

10. MO shall have the right to propose, where appropriate, to elect its members in all the work of the institutions of SPVŽT. This right also applies to candidates for the members of the representative and legislative bodies.

11. Assigned financial and material resources are managed in accordance with applicable regulations.

12. MO shall cease, if the number of members falls below 3, or from a decision of a higher authority.

 

Title VI.

Regional organization

1. Regional Organization consists of all of the local organizations of the SPVŽT in the region.

2. The highest authority of the regional organization is the Regional Conference, it shall meet at least once a year.

3. The Regional Council (KR) is the body elected by the Regional Conference on the territorial principle.

4. The Regional Council is elected by representatives of the MO, and according to the electoral code adopted by the Regional Conference.

5. KR elects Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Secretary, and at least 2 members of the Regional Council.

6. KR is responsible for development of membership, the promotion of SPVŽT and the fulfillment of the objectives of the program of the party.

7. KR draws up the list of the Self-governing bodies of which scope coincides with territorial responsibility.

8.  It actively participates in electoral activity, which concerns its scope in a given territorial unit, and it is responsible for obtained results.

9. With regard to the proceedings in the framework of the SPVŽT KR is subordinated to RS of SPVŽT.

10. In one area there can only be one KR.

 

Title VII.

The Republic Congress

1. Republic Congress (Congress) convened by the Republic Convention once every two years. Convene an extraordinary Congress the President of the RS is obliged, or if said for at least 3/5 of its members, or 2/3 of the Regional Councils or 1/3 of each region.

2. Delegates of the Congress shall be elected at the regional conference according to the in advance given key.

3. Congress shall decide on all political and major issues and has the following powers:

(a) approving the report of the President, a report on the economy, the report of the RRK and RSRK and measures

(b) to approve the constituting documents, i.e. the Program, Statute, and other insignia,

(c) shall elect the President of SPVŽT, Executive Vice-President, Republic Convention, Republic Revision Commission, Republic Arbitration and conciliation Commission, as a rule, on a two-year term, Honorary President of the SPVŽT always on life period

(d) to decide on the withdrawal of the party and property settlement

(e) to dismiss the President, the Executive Vice-President, the Republic Convention and the Commissions.

f) Congress has the right to change the Statute.

 

Title VIII.

Republic Convention of SPVŽT

The highest authority between meetings of Republic Congress is the Republic Convention (hereinafter referred to as RS).

1. Republic Convention manages the activity of the party, shall be responsible for the implementation of the objectives of the program, the documents adopted by Congress, creates the concept and delivers opinions of SPVŽT.

2. The members of Republic Convention and their alternates are elected by Congress. In the case of non - compliance with their obligations they may be removed from a post on the proposal of the Republic Convention or KR. About their appeal RS decides definitively.

3. The number of members of the RS is given by the number of Regional Organizations. A maximum of one member per region, there is no requirement that it must be the Chairman of KR.

4. The Republic Convention shall elect three Vice-Chairmen. It shall appoint from its members press spokesman, and organizing Secretary.

5. RS decides on proposals on candidates for legislatures.

6. It confirms the list into the representative councils of higher territorial units.

7. It approves the budget of the party.

 

Title IX.

The Executive Committee of the Republic Convention

1. The Executive Committee of the Convention (VVS) is made up of the President, Executive Vice-President and Vice-Presidents elected by RS. It performs tasks arising from resolutions of the RS.

2. VVS performs tasks of RS in the period between its meetings and it is responsible to the RS. It draws up documents and opinions on the issues, of which decisions are the responsibility of the RS.

3. Regularly convened by the President of the VVS or Executive Vice Chairman.

4. To proceed the activities and to perform the tasks a secretariat is available to VVS if possible.

 

Title X.

Officials

1. A member may acquire a function only by election with the exception of the first Honorary President. The condition of creation and performance of any function in the framework of the SPVŽT and of the function of candidate and of the function of a member of the representative and legislative bodies is the membership in the civil association - Society of Friends. The termination of membership in SPVŽT occurs without further with a member who will not give up his or her own in this paragraph mentioned function, although his or her membership in the civil association - Society of Friends terminated without further, because he or she substantially breaks the eternal duty of its members, within one month from this termination. The Republic Convention resolution with appeal to Congress till 15 days from delivery of this resolution can declare this termination of membership in SPVŽT with binding effect. Till 1 month from this resolution of Congress each member of SPVŽT can demand the final declaratory court judgment well by the action at law, that the membership in SPVŽT terminated or did not terminate as in this manner.

2. Election of the President, Executive Vice-President, three Vice-Presidents, the Chairman of the RRK and RSRK, Chairmen of KR is made by public or secret vote.

3. For the performance of the function the reward may be granted to working officials. The amount of remuneration shall be approved by RS.

5. The elected officials are responsible for their activities to the authority by which they were elected to the function.

6. Officials are bound by the basic fillings of the functions, which are elaborated in the working rules.

7. As a rule, they are elected for two years.

 

Title XI.

Republic Revision Commission

1. Republic Revision Commission (RRK) is a body of SPVŽT for checking compliance with the documents approved by the Congress and for the control of financial management of SPVŽT. It works according to its plan, approved by the RS.

2. Congress shall elect to the RRK 3 members in the cast: the Chairman and two members.

3. RRK has the right to re-examine the financial management of regional councils or other bodies including RS SPVŽT.

4. In the checking of financial management the member chosen for this Region may not take part in such checks.

5. RRK is obliged to acquaint the controlled authority and RS with the results of the review. Report on its activities serves to Congress.

6. The activities of the RRK are governed by the Statute of the RRK approved by Congress.

7. RRK governs methodically working RK of lower degrees.

8. A member of RRK shall not perform its functions in other elected bodies of the SPVŽT.

 

Title XII.

Republic Conciliation and Arbitration Commission

1. The Conciliation and Arbitration Commission resolves disputes within the party.

2. The Commission has 3 members, it is elected in the composition Chairman and two members by the Congress.

3. The function of the Member of the Commission cannot be associated with functions in the governing body of any degree.

4. The conclusions of solutions the Chairman of the Commission presents to the RS and illustrates by the Protocol.

 

 

Title XIII.

Honorary President

1. The membership of the Honorary President of the SPVŽT cannot lapse otherwise than by the demise of the SPVŽT.

2. The Honorary President of the SPVŽT has the right to decide on the dissolution of the SPVŽT, only the nearest Congress can cancel his or her published decisions (in particular, see Title I, section 6. of these Statute), at the latest before the expiry of one year after its publication, this decision shall take effect on the expiry of one year after its publication, without further, even if this decision of Honorary President about the dissolution of the SPVŽT is invalid or otherwise defective.

3. When the published decision of the Honorary President about the dissolution of the SPVŽT regardless of the validity the suspension of activities of SPVŽT and SPVŽT can only do acts aimed at the removal of the condition, which was the reason for this decision of the Honorary President about the dissolution of the SPVŽT, and the maximum time before the expiry of one year from the date of this decision of the Honorary President.

4. The Honorary President of the SPVŽT has the right to attend all meetings of all other SPVŽT organs, to participate in the discussion here, to submit comments and suggestions of the decisions of these authorities here, however, does not have the right to vote here.

5. Honorary President is elected for life, but he or she can only be revoked by the Congress from a function (in particular, see Title I, section 6 of these Statute). In addition, the Honorary President of the SPVŽT may also resign.

6. Honorary President function is incompatible with any other functions in the framework of the SPVŽT and with the function of a member of the representative and legislative bodies, at the time of the adoption of the function or on the performance of any function, with the exception of his or her demise, in the other institutions, any bodies of the SPVŽT, municipality, County or State or supranational international organization by the Honorary President a Honorary President function terminates without further.

7. When the effectiveness of the above resignation of Honorary President from Office, the effectiveness of the above removal of the Honorary President from the function or effectiveness of the above extinction of the function of a Honorary President, or when his or her death SPVŽT is required to elect a new Honorary President (in particular, see Title I, section 6 of these Statute) to the time before the expiry of one year from the death or the effectiveness of the resignation or the effectiveness of the remove or effectiveness of this extinction or SPVŽT deleted without further uniformly definitively and the ultimate effect by the expiry of one year from the death or the effectiveness of the resignation or the effectiveness of the remove or effectiveness of this extinction.

8. The first Honorary President is JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D, born 29.1.1973, permanent residence Mírová 41098/4, 69301 Hustopece.

 

 

     

Title XIV

Principles of management

1. The assets of the SPVŽT are made up of financial and material resources obtained from voluntary donations, membership fees, or success in the elections State contributions.

2. All assets are used to support the activities of the SPVŽT in the sense of fulfilling their electoral program.

3. Costs and expenses represent mainly costs for the rental of offices, energy charges, equipment, office equipment, postage, phones, and other operating costs.

4. Officials and personnel of the SPVŽT shall be entitled to reimbursement of travel costs and the agreed remuneration.

5. Organizations and bodies act in relations within the competences laid down in the range of the following principles and bear full responsibility for their application.

6. Permission to withdraw funds and to handle the financial resources the President, Executive Vice-President and Vice-President responsible for the management of SPVŽT have.

7. The activities of the SPVŽT in the economic issues are governed by the Vice-President for the management in accordance with the economic legislation.

8. The draft of the annual budget shall be drawn up by the Executive Committee and approved by the Executive Committee of the RS. Proposal for a global budget is approved by Congress.

9. If the dissolution of the SPVŽT without legal successor, the balance of the party holding will be converted to a charity of the same or a similar program like SPVŽT.

 

Title XIV.

Common final provisions

1. The statutory representatives of the SPVŽT are the President and Executive Vice-President.

2. At the level of the KR, the Chairman or Deputy Chairman has the authority to sign. At the level of the MO it is the Chairman.

3. The members of all the institutions and organizations are bound by confidentiality of information concerning the facts, if the hearing was declared closed or confidential.

4. After the cancellation of the MO its members may go to other active MO with the consent of KR.

5. The number of delegates of the Regional Conference shall be established according to the given key. The same procedures are for the election of the delegates to the Congress. The key for the election shall be determined by RS.

6. The Congress shall decide on the dissolution of SPVŽT with the exception of the aforementioned decision of the Honorary President about the dissolution of the SPVŽT, Congress also decides on the disposal of assets in accordance with valid regulations.

7. All decisions taken after the approval of this Statute by any authority of the SPVŽT, which are in violation with this Statute, are invalid.

In Hustopeče, day.................. 

 

Note: the Statute is changed Statute of the far-right Workers Party of Social Justice as a symbol of the possibility of changing the extreme non - humanism to extreme humanism even in our society.

 

Articles of Civil Association

 Society of Friends

 

(for those interested to become founding members, please e-mail: ak-gruza@seznam.cz )

 

Articles of Civil Association - Society of Friends

Established: .................................................. ..........................

 

Preamble:

The main object of the civil association Society of Friends (further also association) is to achieve the harmony of everyone and of all things, that means, all the living creatures (each animal, insect, plant, fungus, living cell, bacteria, virus, machine conscious of itself, etc.) could in future (evolutionarily) become friends for life and death.

 

 Article I.
Eternal duty of all living creatures

(1) Fundamental duty of all living creatures is to cause the least possible death and pain. The perfect living creature eats then only plant fruits and plant seeds from all living creatures. (Further also eternal duty of members).

2) Any change of this eternal duty of all living creatures, who are members of this association (further also members), is inadmissible. In the event of any change or nullification of this eternal duty of members the extinction of association occurs automatically.

(3) By the interpretation of these articles it is impossible to entitle any elimination or threat of this eternal duty of members.
(4) Member has right also to eat only gradually in extreme emergency (especially from serious health reasons) eggs, in extreme emergency carrions of living creatures died of natural causes, on principle of old age, or in extreme emergency collected blood of non-slaughtered animals and humans and milk, or in extreme emergency plants, all always the most mercifully as possible bred and killed, and products purely from them.

 

Article II.
Membership in association

(1) A member can become each living creature, who in face of the association and its members binds always to keep the eternal duty of members and at the same time he or she binds to keep the valid Articles of the Association.

(2) The extinction of a membership in the association happens as well automatically in case of the member, who substantially breaks the eternal duty of members. The general meeting resolution can declare this extinction with binding effect. Till 1 month from this resolution each member, also excluded member, can demand the final declaratory court judgment well by the action at law, that the membership in association terminated or did not terminate as in this manner.

(3) A member excluded from the association according to these Articles can become repeatedly the member of the association earliest after lapse of time 3 months from his or her exclusion, a member, whose membership in the association became extinct according to these Articles for the substantial violation of the eternal duty of members, can become repeatedly the member earliest after lapse of time 5 years from the final resolution about this extinction of his or her membership.

(4) Each member is in capacity at any time by the unilateral legal act to leave the association.

(5) All the members are obliged always to act to each other conformable with good morals, especially by all the approachable means to defend life of every member against his or her loss or serious affect the health (e.g. hunger, thirst, cold, flaming, by lack of the health care, etc.), this duty is to judge especially with reference to the lasting observance of the eternal duty of members. 

Article III.
General meeting

(1) The general meeting (further only general meeting) decides about all matters of the association with the absolute majority of voting members. Each member has at the general meeting one vote. Announcement of an object act, place and time of proceedings of the general meeting must be published with a sufficient timing-advance on web pages of the association.

(2) Members can make above-mentioned decisions also outside the general meeting (e.g. by means of e-mail, especially by means of the electronic signature of the qualified certificated authorities). The member, who at the general meeting explicitly or tacitly abstains voting, is supposed to vote against proposed decision.

 

Article. IV.
Agents

(1) Two agents always act on the outside on behalf of the association, the legal acts on behalf of the association both agents are entitled to do so only together.

(2) The general meeting chooses and removes agents among members. An agent is in capacity to resign from his or her function by the unilateral legal act. The function of an agent extincts as well with the extinction of his or her membership in the association. After the extinction of his or her function is the former agent obliged to do all acts, so as the association and its members do not suffer on their laws or appropriate interests any prejudice.

(3) The agent is obligated at any time in due form to inform any member on his or her request about matters of the association. Both agents decide together about all other things of the association, that before the general meeting has not been reserved or has not been decided. 

Article. V.
Possession of association

(1) The association is financed especially from gifts of its members.

 

Article VI.
Extinction of association

(1) After the dissolution of the association the remaining assets from the realization of all estates and after satisfaction of all creditors of the association divide among actual and former members and their heirs according to quota of estates, which they give to the association.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Film: "The Philosophy of Balance and the slaughter tax. Is nature’s evolution merciful?"(with expert opinions)

  deska

Film in Czech

http://youtu.be/YhOv47fQlRU

vlajkaFilm in English

http://youtu.be/ibV-Fwh4sUc

If one succeeds in accomplishing at least one case of friendship of two separate viruses or bacteria or living cells that would otherwise devour each other, then, in my opinion, the current concept of Darwin’s theory will be partly refuted and it will be possible to add to it my hypothesis on the mercy of nature’s evolution, or more precisely, the ability of all microorganisms to recognize and remember a friend or enemy in other microorganisms.

The purpose of this experiment is partly to refute Darwin's theory of evolution. I intend to prove that the foundations of human morality already exist at the microbial level, implying that religion, for instance, is not the opium of people, i.e. some sort of artificial creation, but that its foundations are already encoded in the natural basis, i.e. in our microorganisms. Thus, in the case of the food chain, there are always two choices, either the struggle for life or symbiosis, already at the microbial level. This means that the struggle for life in nature is not inevitable, that already at the microbial level even in the case of microorganisms which normally devour each other there exists in a majority of all instances a choice between the Darwinian struggle for life and symbiosis, where the Darwinian struggle for life is always the worst option. In the above-mentioned sense, Darwin's theory as an inevitable struggle for life in the food chain in nature would be refuted by means of this experiment. This general moral behavior towards all living organisms does not then represent morality for morality's sake, but morality for the purpose of symbiosis, which brings the greatest possible benefits to all involved, whether at the level of microorganisms or at the human level.

This film is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

.

 

 

 

PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE

   JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.

 

The book was purchased for production costs by: The North Bohemian Research Library (Ustí nad Labem), Study and Research Library of the Pilsen Region (Pilsen), Moravian-Silesian Research Library in Ostrava, Study and Research Library in Hradec Králové, The Central Bohemian Research Library in Kladno.

 This book is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

 

http://www.spvzt.cz/FilosofieRovnovahyKniha.htm 

(book in Czech in the format: html , pdf , doc , cover in the format html , pdf , doc )

http://www.spvzt.cz/BalancePhilosophyBook.htm

(vlajka osn book in English in the format: html , pdf , doc , cover in the format: html , pdf , doc )

 

PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:

 

„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." 

   

All the rest consists more in views (speculations). 

   

(I.e. the maximum compliance of good and evil individuals, virtually good and evil) 

 

In terms of Rational Mystique of paradise of my Philosophy of Balance it is possible, that, if I have a descendant with my current partner as a single human before death, whose brain, virtually body embody the entire Universe, through the birth of our child as the second human before death in the Universe, whose brain, virtually body will embody the same Universe, so there is roughly a doubling amount of living cells which will thus embody the Universe, and thus increase of level difference of its energy, virtually movement, virtually restoration of level difference of the energy of the Universe after its current substantial burnout (entropy) and it will allow the gradual resurrection from the dead of all dead living creatures through steady supply of new energy in this our Universe by the reproduction of more and more people before death, whose brains, virtually bodies will embody multiplicatively the Universe, and unlike normal Posthumous or cloning of descendants of a single human before death after his or her death, when there is a constant stagnation or continual loss of level difference of energy of the Universe newly embodied by the brain, virtually body of the child, that is the constant stagnation or deepening of entropy (burn) of the Universe and its approaching absolute vacuum.

 

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MY PHILOSOPHY OF  BALANCE AND CONTEMPORARY RELIGIONS?

All contemporary religions operate like an opium (as Karl Marx already pointed out), then as a drug, which facilitates human being in a world, where is so much death and pain, promising a reward of the perfect life of their adherents in the invisible world and many religions remove from them the bad conscience from killing of living creatures. Here, I mean Hindu, which promises salvation from suffering in this world-moksha through their fusion with the divine essence, Brahman, Buddhism, which promises emptiness-nirvana after death, Judaism and Christianity, which promise heaven with God, virtually Jesus of Nazareth maybe the Christ as the king after the death of a man.

These religions cure, improve with this drug the world by pointing to the man’s responsibility for his or her life after death, when using the so-called subconscious oceanic feeling in the psyche of every man and in my opinion, as well as of other living beings for life in a world, where everyone likes each other. Many of these religions are also a danger of fanaticism, because that drug relieves humans of their evil conscience from killing of living creatures through various rituals.

Philosophy of Balance is not such a drug, because it promises a reward for its implementation already in this visible world (not only after death), in the form of a life of individual, who everyone loves and who loves everybody (it is concerned the realization of the oceanic feeling of a man in this world, a reward of happy life in this world promised by an earlier form of Judaism as well, but that in the history the Holocaust of orthodox Jews refuted definitively, the reason for this tragedy according to my Philosophy of Balance was that Judaism functioned in the past, such as that drug, because it silenced the remorse of bad conscience from killing of especially other living creatures than humans). Philosophy of the Balance is not the drug, because it promises an early change in our world (not only after death). In a world, where everybody likes each other, where all the living creatures would be friends for life and death, through the proposed text of the slaughter tax (similarly early arrival of salvation of our world was promised by early Christianity through the second coming of Jesus of Nazareth, Christ maybe, when this coming did not take place, they resigned early redemption of our world and Christian teaching was changed on that drug, promising a reward to his followers after their death).

Given the above, the Philosophy of Balance is not one of many other religions, but a rational attempt to change our world already in this life, of which success or failure, both in its use in the personal life of individuals as in the case of using the proposed text of the slaughter tax for the whole society, allow its verification (in terms of falsification of scientific theories defined by philosopher Karl Popper), then its confirmation or refutation through a scientific experiment.

HOW TO ENFORCE THE SLAUGHTER TAX IN POLITICS?

The answer can be found in my Philosophy of Balance. The animals themselves have no power to enforce the slaughter tax, or to vote for it, nor, that they can fight for it with weapons in hand, so present politicians have no interest to enforce it, because it would not bring them any more popularity with their target voters groups. This is similar to the protection of unborn human embryos under the Catholic Church vain to prohibit abortions, human embryos also cannot make war or vote. Therefore, for now the enforcement of the slaughter tax is in a still relatively favorable political and economic situation virtually impossible.

The only regime that succeeded in enforcing extensive animal protection in Europe was Hitler's Nazi regime in Germany. Roughly, therefore, it would be said that it was necessary to kill people for the enforcement of extensive animal protection, the result of this attempt ended also in a total failure.

According to the Philosophy of Balance deepening of the current economic and political crisis in the Western world will continue, at the end of this crisis here will be once again the general misery, ruins of economies, the establishment of dictatorships and war in the Western world will be as under fascism in the last century. According to the Philosophy of Balance the reason for this crisis is evolutionary imperfection, virtually. immorality in the Western world that blatantly lives on debt, in other words they misspend goods belonging to someone else to rob the State, tunneling by the rich, the poor in unearned social benefits, the cause of immorality, virtually evolutionary imperfection of Westerners is then according to my Philosophy of Balance hatred and revenge of to death tortured living creatures by our civilization, especially livestock in industrial factory farms, virtually hatred and revenge of living microorganisms of these to death tortured living creatures and their relatives living microorganisms.

Therefore, one might say according to the Philosophy of Balance in terms of livestock and other animals and the future enactment of the slaughter tax, the worse will be the global crisis, virtually suffering of people, the better, either from which people will learn and they will enact timely the slaughter tax and thus stop rising above revenge of our civilization to death tortured living creatures, especially animals, or they will not learn from it, and then either our civilization will stop to exist, such as nuclear war, or the slaughter tax will be enforced at the cost of blood of many people through the victory of a dictator, Nazism was traditionally protecting animals, so for example the new Nazi dictator.

 (see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SECONDARY SCHOOL PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE

   JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.

The Secondary School Philosophy of Balance was purchased for production costs by: Study and Research Library of the Pilsen Region (Pilsen).

This book is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

http://www.spvzt.cz/Stredoskolskafilosofierovnovahy.html

 (book in Czech in the format: html , pdf , doc , cover in the format pdf , doc )

http://www.spvzt.cz/EngSecondarySchoolBalancePhilosophy.htm

(vlajka osn book in English in the format: html , pdf , doc , cover in the format: html , pdf , doc )

 

PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:

 

„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." 

   

All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

   

(I.e. the maximum compliance of good and evil individuals, virtually good and evil) 

     

Secondary School Philosophy of Balance presents a detailed summary of the basics of all current human knowledge and putting it in a single system, according to the Philosophy of Balance.

(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )

 

 

 

 

 

 

Symbiotic agriculture and experiments of natural science proving Philosophy of Balance

I want to grow potatoes according to my Philosophy of Balance, potatoes are next to the corn along with soy products the important plant component of my food in extreme emergency, it is not a plant fruit or plant seed, due to prioritization of national foods and farmers to non eco-friendly imported foods at a greater distance, but which can support on the other hand poor developing countries of producers of these foods, and they could become an important component of the diet of my hens.

I want to educate pests of potatoes, in particular Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetles not to reproduce excessively, then they will also have the right according to my Philosophy of Balance to a long, happy and dignified life and death with almost no physical and mental pain. Therefore, I will intervene against them according to the rules of the Philosophy of Balance only if they reproduce excessively. If they do not reproduce excessively, then I will let them to eat my potato plants which apparently will improve the quality of their existing variety as regards their resistance against these pests. It will be a kind of symbiosis between my plants, namely potatoes and their pests, in particular Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetles.

If I succeed  in the education of pests of my plants of potatoes not to reproduce excessively and to live in symbiosis with my plants of potatoes, so it will be a proof that nature can be merciful, even at such a primitive level, such as insects and plants that even at this level and in this case of quite hostile species of living creatures it is possible and the best solution for all concerned their symbiosis and that their Darwin’s fighting for life and death is also in this case only the possible and at the same time the worst solution.

The first scientific proof of my Philosophy of Balance, or possibility of nature to be merciful as its best solution at the level of animal production is, inter alia, the symbiosis of my dog, or carnivore, of me or omnivore and of my hens or our exclusive animal prey, when meat diet of my dog and of me as a person and probably even of my hens is formed for several years exclusively by corpses of naturally dead hens, in principle, of old age from my shelter for broilers (see my book Philosophy of Balance, Book II Application of Philosophy of Balance in material world, 2nd Part the Behavior according to Philosophy of Balance).

(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 18/07/2013 13:10:42

Post:

Today I harvested my other two plants of my potatoes from my above symbiotic way of agriculture, from both planted potatoes I gained the harvest of 2551 grams of healthy large early potatoes. I waited for a green herb of potato plant to become dry, so that the whole plant did not die at harvest. The result of this experiment proves a real possibility in the nature of possible maximal symbiosis (i.e. harmony or paradise) of my entire food chain of me as a human, my dog, my hens (males and females), my potatoes and their pests, especially Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetles, hence of all living creatures.

Photos: https://www.facebook.com/dalibor.gruza/media_set?set=a.10200289137693320.1073741827.1299966627&type=1

(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )

In details see book:

 

http://www.spvzt.cz/symbiotickezemedelstvi.htm

 (book in Czech in the format: html , pdf , doc )

http://www.spvzt.cz/symbioticagriculture.htm

(vlajka osn book in English in the format: html , pdf , doc )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moderated discussion on the political orientation of SPVŽT:

Posts to a moderated discussion, please send on zakladatel@spvzt.cz , the editorial staff reserves the right not to publish inappropriate posts

    1. Position of Philosophy of Balance on Judeo-Christian morality of today’s democratic society

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 28/10/2011 12:18:33


I disagree with the eccelesiastical financial restitution, therefore, already for about a quarter of a year I do not go, and I will continue not to go here for confession and to Holy communion until there will be some adoption of a fair solution to the Roman-Catholic Church.


I agree with the physical restitution of assets to churches, primarily because the Church performs useful work in the society, thus they preach love and educate us in love. I disagree with the monetary church restitution in the amount of 100 billion Czech Crowns, because the State will have to borrow for this financial restitution, because due to its debts in the State budget of the Czech Republic, and probably given the current debt ratio of State it will not have money even in the future. The ideal solution would be to return to Churches in ecclesiastical restitution physically half of the assets the churches would relinquish half of the assets that will not be returned, for the fact that half of the State current contribution at ratio of the State budget will remain in future years. This solution would enable financing of as well newly emerging churches, which will also be preaching and educating society in love, and would prevent such that Churches will not corrupt, to which the property would be returned.


Now to the Roman-Catholic theological look at my Philosophy of Balance and at by me advocated Act concerning the slaughter tax, which can be summarized as follows:


PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE


PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:


„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." 

   

All the rest consists more in views (speculations). It applies to all my Philosophy of Balance. 

   

(I.e. the maximum compliance of good and evil individuals, virtually good and evil) 


Apparently according to the traditions of the Catholic Church (as in the Bible these words are not probably): the structure and layout of the Eucharistic Celebration, Schematic overview of the course of the celebration of the Eucharist (Sundays and festivals), the sacrificial feast, preparation of the gifts, Eucharistic prayer: preface and Sanctus, epiclesis before the words of the provision, the words of the provisions of the Eucharist, anamnesis, bringing victims to communion, epiclesis prayers with reminders of the Saints, the doxology, the third Eucharistic prayer (as an example)


After preface and Sanctus priest with spread hands says:


Verily you are a holy God, (epiclesis)

and everything, that you created, rightly praise you: ...


(Literature: http://www.tf.jcu.cz/getfile/5caa213d79580807 )


Prayer the Our Father (the Holy Bible, Matthew Chapter 6, verses 9-10):


9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.

10 Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.

 

(Literature: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew%206&version=KJV )


Comment according to the Philosophy of Balance:


Therefore, "our father", not just the father of the people, but our father, that is also of all living creatures. "Everything, that you created, rightly praise you", i.e. all rightly praise you, therefore, not only people, but also every living creature, that you created and that you seem to be a father, because you created them, which, however, also apparently assumes that mercy in the form of the victim of a living creature for another living creature, or creatures, especially for a human or people. How can creatures praise rightly the God, if He requires necessarily living creatures by ruthless, very painful victim or their life in a lot of pain or a very painful death after a short life in great pain, in this case these tortured living creatures would hate the God rather than the God rightly praise. God thus necessarily requires of all living creatures, in particular of human the sacrifice but only a merciful sacrifice, death almost without pain after a long, little painful life of all living creatures, even though the living creature dies, they will love the God rightly and not hate.


To the slaughter tax, it can be noted that  the will of God shall be both in heaven and in earth (see above: "Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven."), that God is rightly praised by everything He created, therefore by all living creatures (see above: "and everything, that you created, rightly praise you") as it is in heaven and in earth (see above: "Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven."), which is at present mainly in conflict with the torture of animals in current agricultural slaughter factory farms. The slaughter tax fixes the will of God (Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.) to be closer to all living creatures, today in particular, so the most tortured animals in the agricultural slaughter factory farms, could rightly praise the God their creator (see above: "and everything, that you created, rightly praise you").


(see http://filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ )

  2. And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other

   
Author:
Dalibor Grůza

Time: 26/05/2012


quoted:

Neronisi,

According to the Philosophy of Balance is the sentence: And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloak forbid not to take thy coat also., of the Gospels 6.29 Luke, in violation with the foundation of the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth, perhaps Christ, which is love. It comes to me from 51-60% to be a late addition. The correct approach to this situation by love is a Universal ethic of my Philosophy of Balance, Ist book. The correct answer to this situation should be referred to my ethics always educational (i.e., lovingly kept), rather than a devastating counterattack. I'll give you an example, imagine a child who hits his or her parents into one face, if his parent give another face and have not made any educational countermeasures, so eventually the child could grow into a serial killer. Love of the parents of such a child is reflected primarily in the form of educational countermeasure that is done with love, so to correct this error in the child's behavior, not to devastate the child as punishment.


I do the same educational, not a devastating counter-measure against the attack of extreme right-wingers, maybe the fascists against unlawful attack against the Philosophy of Balance, we will not see the future of serial killers, and they make educational countermeasure against my weakness in battle, in other words they learn me by their attacks to fight. It comes as a method of mutual education, rather than to destroy us all, by merciful evolution of nature, theologically-biblically speaking, the evolution of nature educates us through our relationships like the Lord - Judge of hosts (Hebrew adonaj cava), which can be translated as the Mister - Lord of Army (see my movie).


(see http://filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ )


see http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?whichpage=0.933333333333333&TOPIC_ID=1589&#25413
   
 

   3. How are different and how are the same Nazism and Philosophy of Balance

 
Author:
Dalibor Grůza

Time: 06/06/2011 10:37:58


The basics of the philosophy of Nazism can be described as follows:


... Hitler expressed this attitude by the words: "nature is cruel and that's why I'm cruel.", i.e. social Darwinism, therefore, it could be rephrased: "Charles Darwin discovered in his theory of nature evolution, that nature is cruel, because even the Nazis are cruel", so they can kill the enemy women and children as the wild animals, which like a pack of wolves would be merciful only to healthy members of their pack, in the wild they kill females and baby animals of their prey, unlike Stalin and his army, who according to an ancient tradition as the continuator of steppe Mongols were not allowed to kill women and children.


Or according to Himmler: "a man is nothing special, just a piece of nature", or in the training manual, SS: the concept of humanity is biological nonsense, or humanism is under the Nazis, or according to Darwinism, the artificial creation of a man which is against nature and not valid in the wild.


Nietzsche's philosophy is a mere transfer of Darwinism in philosophy. The Western concept of Darwinism, that the struggle for life in the food chain in human society takes place in the framework of the free market, is inconsistent using of the Darwinism, which maintains the validity, contrary to Darwinism and its teachings, many of the old religious, primarily Jewish and Christian morality in society.

 

Literature: On October 4, 1943 Himmler spoke to the commanders of the SS in Poznan. Among other things he stated, that a member of the SS must be honest, moral, faithful and comradely to all the members of their own blood, but never to anyone else. What will happen with the Russians, what will happen with the Czechs, it is totally unconcerned to him. It is necessary to save and to place the children of a good German blood in Germany. He was interested whether other people live in luxury or starve to death, only if they served the German culture. About starvation to death of ten thousands of Russian women during the digging of the anti-tank ditch he did not care, important to him it was, whether the tank ditch for Germany was completed. The Germans are the only real people in the world and as well as they behave decently towards animals, they behave decently towards these human animals, but it would be a crime against their own blood to worry about them and to communicate their ideas with them. He pointed out, that about the resettlement of the Jews and about the mass extermination of the Jewish race the members of the SS must never speak publicly. Most of the members of the SS have already seen hundreds, thousands of corpses together. Nevertheless apart from exception of human weakness the members of the SS must remain polite. Therein their hardness lies. (see http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Himmler ) It was Frederick Nietzsche, the spiritual father of the concepts of the "human-predator" and the "blond beast", who came in the second half of the 19th century with the suggestive doctrine, of which essence was the division of moral systems on the system of the slaves (adhering to regret, compassion and altruism) and the system of lords (praising selfishness, sensory delights and contempt for the weak). Boria Sax writes: "Nietzsche was of the opinion, that the morality of slaves is the credo of the illness and the morality of lords is the credo of the health. In Judaism and even more in Christianity the weak won over the strong." And further: "Predators" in the ranks of people were destined to give orders, 'the vegetarians' were destined to obey." It is significant, that Nietzsche had never apparently seen a large predator elsewhere than at the zoo and even he did not specify, which specific animal he had in mind. Wolves, bears, lions and eagles he melded in a single super predator. … Darwin's thesis, that the success in the competitive struggle for survival had favoured individual races according to "level of their civilization", in Germany Ernst Haeckel led to the extreme, when he declared, that the Germanic race came from great apes the furthest away. Richard Wagner wrote that "'inferior races' come 'from the monkeys', while the Aryans derive their origin 'from the gods'." … "Hitler was a vegetarian and he apparently tried to imitate the composer Richard Wagner. Several leaders of the Nazi government followed him, including Hess and Goebbels. Himmler, who was influenced by Buddhism, even ordered eating vegetarian diet to commanders. (see review of the book Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust, Boria Sax, American historian and linguist, Pavel Hub, Klimkovice 2011, http://www.kockaapravo.cz/clanky-clanek.php?id=33 )


This, or Darwinism is in violation of the foundations of evolutionary hypotheses according to the Philosophy of Balance, which could be summarized as follows:


Nature is merciful, therefore I am merciful (see my documentary film: "The Philosophy of Balance and the slaughter tax. Is nature’s evolution merciful?" with the opinions of experts- naturalists to this evolutionary hypothesis).


The largest of the humanism, or universal love or general mercy and the greatest strength of the approaching omnipotence; (see Hebrew biblical name adonaj cava, which can be translated as Lord - Mister or God of hosts or Lord - Mister or God of Army) is the goal of evolution or development of nature in all living creatures (through my natural evolutionary hypotheses about the ability of any micro-organisms to identify and also genetically remember their friend and enemy, partly proven by me by the symbiosis of my dog, or predator and my hens or his only animal prey, see my theme Paradise begins with a scientific experiment on my garden on the Forum http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375 ).


In my opinion the result of the above erroneous outcomes of Nazism, consisting in the application of Darwinism was the ultimate evolutionary failure of Hitler and Nazi Germany in World War II.


But I agree with Nazism, as in Nazi Germany valid until today the most sophisticated and extensive legislated protection of animals and nature, ever enacted in Europe, is concerned (Hitler, Goring, Himmler and Rudolf Hess could be described as a major nature conservationist, in today's terminology the Green party in Europe politicians, Hitler reportedly oversaw himself the creation of these laws on the protection of nature and animals). And it's because of my evolutionary hypotheses about nature, to be merciful, so that in nature there is the only morality, or love or mercy in relation to all living creatures, even to those microorganisms as the only living cell, bacteria or virus, so that a double morality does not exist in nature and does not apply, i.e. interpersonal morality and morality to other living creatures. The basic evolutionary natural law of this morality is according to the Philosophy of Balance to all living creatures still causing the least possible death and pain.


(see http://filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ )


Literature:
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nacismus , http://is.muni.cz/th/102931/fss_b/Pelikan_BP_Pojeti_krajiny_a_jeji_ochrany_v_nacismu.txt , film Mongol, Kazakhstan, 2007, directed by Sergei Bodrov; Cast: Tadanobu Asano (Temüdžin), Amadou Mamadakov, Honglei Sun, Ying Bai


 
4. Position of Philosophy of Balance on Nazism and Stalinism

 

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 24/05/2011 11:00:59


So far discussions on http://www.exotopedia.org/wiki/Diskuse:Dalibor_Gr%C5%AFza including my censored contribution:



I don't consider your web site as good, I consider them as a far-right, therefore apparently it is a Server Location: Spartanburg, SC in the United States, they are insulting the people of another skin color and people with disabilities, and praise Mr. Vandas from the Workers Party of Social Justice, and as some form of negative publicity for my work Philosophy of Balance. According to the Philosophy of Balance Stalin and his army were so evolutionarily unjust, yet much evolutionarily fairer than Hitler and his army, because Stalin and his army did not murder in an organized mass way women and children, and that, unlike Hitler and his army, who roughly from 1941 killed in an organized mass way Jewish and Roma women and children. To kill a child or a woman, according to the Philosophy of Balance is the biggest evolutionary injustices in our world, which is, according to my Philosophy of Balance, most likely the most punished by the evolution of nature, because it causes the greatest possible hate of friends. Philosophy of Balance welcomes on Hitler and Germany in particular the fact that until today they have yet enacted unrivalled extensive animal welfare legislation in Nazi Germany and apparently also on the German occupied territories. This Hitler's animal protection is also carrying out only obligation of all living creatures according to the Philosophy of Balance still to cause the least possible death and pain, and apparently its evolutionary Hitler’s reward was his success in the war until 1941.


Literature: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights#1933:_Tierschutzgesetz

 

5. Discussion with some members of my former Green Party

 
    Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 4:56 AM

    Theme: Re: concurrence of membership in two political parties

    Enforcement of the slaughter tax in current politics is better than the current political enforcement of the ban (as suggested by the part of the animal protectors) for many reasons. Currently it better corresponded to the main legal and moral obligation of all living creatures, to still causing the least possible death and pain (in each particular moment of history and their lives) according to my Philosophy of Balance (approximately 700 pages A4), of which two books are available on this Web site. See the web site of a new Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures, see http://www.spvzt.cz/ .

Dr. Grůza


    Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 5:44 AM

    Theme: Re: concurrence of membership in two political parties

    Currently, taxation of the slaughter tax is politically more realistic of which income will be tied in the Act, inter alia, to the transformation of our agriculture into more merciful, inter alia, slaughter breeding of animals, rather than a ban on agricultural slaughter of factory farming-animal concentration camps.

Dr. Grůza

 

    Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 5:54 AM

    Theme: Re: concurrence of membership in two political parties

My Philosophy of Balance foresees in the future, when a democracy will be prepared for it, to increase the slaughter tax on products from agricultural slaughter factory farming-animal concentration camps at such a high level, which will be equal to the practical prohibition, or a complete ban on the slaughter factory farming, both in the domestic and the imported products from abroad to the Czech Republic.

Dr. Grůza


Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 6:05 AM

Theme: Re: concurrence of membership in two political parties

In addition, the slaughter tax will apply a lower rate in principle, also on the other slaughters of animals for example even in organic farms, unlike products from animals, dead of natural causes, especially of old age.

Dr. Grůza

6. Why are agricultural slaughter factory farms today's concentration camps of animals

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 27/11/2012

 

In these agricultural slaughter factory farms an animal lives from birth its entire short life, which lasts until its early slaughter in the great suffering, unlike home and also organic slaughter breeds of these animals. After the birth of the animal an animal is in these agricultural slaughter factory farms doped by growth hormones, so that it quickly has the weight, it is limited in movement, in order not to lose gained weight, and in a month or two it goes to slaughter, its entire short life it is so tortured by human. See http://www.ohz.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=44&Itemid=83 .

7. Interview with Hare Krishna-an important Hindu organization and Hindus about eating meat and carnivores

On 18. May 2013, at 6:48 PM, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.-advokát <ak-gruza@seznam.cz> wrote:

Dear Hinduist,

 

... I was doing an experiment (see my book Philosophy of Balance www.spvzt.cz or www.spvzt.sweb.cz ) with my longstanding ovo-lacto vegetarian diet (for the uninitiated, I have eaten plant diet, from animal food only milk and eggs), while I was watching the composition of my food, there was no animal ingredient from slaughtered animals, for example food additives, I have not eaten any food supplements or vitamins that could be made from slaughtered animals.

The result of this my long-term ovo-lacto vegetarian diet has been the following health problems: abdominal pain, flatulence, diarrhea, vomiting, sores on the mucous membranes, skin peeling, allergic shock (itching and rash throughout the body), sore on joints and articular cartilage, fatigue or tiredness at any greater effort, these problems will disappear whenever I eat the meat of my carrions (cadavers) of animals. Because of your moral resistance to eat carrions (cadavers) I will not die of nutritional inadequacy, for this reason because of my moral scruples I don't have to kill, or I don't have to get killed intentionally any animal for the purpose of my food and I will continue to eat the minimum required amount of carrions (cadavers) of the animals when my above health symptoms occur.

Dr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.

Answer for SPVŽT:

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 09-12/12/2012


The Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures, wants to unite and fight for the rights of all living creatures, as the living creatures I think both people and animals, including the carnivorous animals, and also plants and other living creatures.


I don't want to split forces, therefore, I want to fight only against our current worst evil in relation to animals, factory slaughter farms. To do this, you need the money for the transformation of our agriculture in a more merciful ways of animal farming, which the slaughter tax should serve. According to me it is the first most important step in a good direction of SPVŽT, according to the society's readiness the next will follow.
 
I myself don't eat products from slaughtered animals, even not my dog, from animal foods I eat only eggs from a home breed, where they do not slaughter or get slaughtered any hens and cocks, or goat's milk from breed, where they do not slaughter or get slaughtered any goats or he - goats, and broilers from my shelter for chickens, which have not been killed intentionally by any human, deceased of old age. These naturally dead chickens I also feed my dog including eggs and the milk and vegetarian feed ami dog. I myself would probably not survive healthy in my experience only on the ovo-lacto vegetarian diet without this meat, and quite surely in my experience without this meat my dog, which is a carnivore, wouldn't survive healthy.


My opinion about the medical necessity of eating the meat in my case and in the case of my dog is based on my experience, or fixed by my scientific experiment with my long-term lacto-ovo vegetarian diet in my case and in the case of my dog (see my book Philosophy of Balance available on this site). By the way in India there are kept almost no carnivorous cats and dogs because people do not want to feed them meat. And what concerns the health need to eat meat to humans living long-term in India, whose ancestors were the generation accustomed to eating meat, I present an example of the current Dalai Lama, who, though he wants to be a vegetarian, had serious health problems and he began to eat meat (see http://mysticbanana.com/why-isnt-the-dalai-lama-a-vegetarian.html ).


Eating naturally dead animals by human is not a new idea, but the idea is thousands of years old and it comes from India. Survived in old Roma (sometimes also Gypsies), who originate and in the middle ages they came to Europe from India. "Under the old Roma are carrions (cadavers) cleaner meat, because the animal didn't die in a violent death", and Roma also invented an ingenious recipe, how to eat the carrions (cadavers), "the carrions are boiled in more waters" (see http://www.mills.cz/assets/Absol_prace/AP2010-SP_denni/Rosecka-SP2010.pdf ), and it was at least thousands of years ago, when they came to Europe, and when no one has ever heard of the sterilization of surgical instruments. See my book Philosophy of Balance on this web site.


After our discussion with Trilokátma dása 11.12.2012 I received by post the current guide named GÓRAKŠJA and vegetarianism, issued or distributed by farm Krishna court of Hare Krishna movement in the Czech Republic, where there is on the page 5 stated:

 
"If the people who despite all the counterarguments insist on preserving animal food sources, they will eat only animals that die in a natural way, they avoid ingestion of "fear poisons". The animals will produce more offspring and understandable after a transitional period of a lack one get more meat than before. "


According by you cited a Dutch political party translated from English, see http://www.partyfortheanimals.nl/content/view/308//faq/view/50/14 :


Is the Party for the Animals against eating meat or fish?

 

The most animal-friendly menu is one without any animal produce. A large number of the members of the Party for the Animals are vegetarians or vegans. However, we also have members who eat meat or fish. It is not a choice that we try to force upon others. Nonetheless, we do strongly advocate that consumers (both party members and non - party members) who eat animal products should chose meat, eggs or dairy products, which do not derive from the factory farming industry, and non - endangered fish species

 
Dr. Grůza

 
The opinion of the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement-an important Hindu organisation:

 
Author: Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement

Time: 09/12/2012


Hello Mr. Grůzo,


When I started reading your message, I was happy that somebody finally is starting to care about animal suffering caused in the slaughterhouses. Very soon, however, my enthusiasm has passed me when I read that you are not concerned about whether the animals are killed, but rather that they are "killed in the organic way”. Only the expression of organic slaughter breeding is at least for me incredible. On the slaughter of whether any is not merciful, fair, or organic. I understand that in the current agricultural farms are experiencing animals during their short and poor life far more suffering than in some organic farms, but the result is the same, in the end, the animals are cruelly killed.


In the Statute you write that you want to create a humanistic society on the principles of Justice and mercy to all living creatures. I don't understand what you consider as merciful and fair at organic slaughter breeding. In the Statute you write that your intention is the gradual transition to a more merciful way of diet, but at the same time you don't want to force anyone to switch to vegetarianism. There is, according to you a merciful alternative to killing? I think that your idea of factory farming, in which the animals die of old age, and then they will be ingested by carnivores, is as unrealistic as trying to convince dependent gambler that to play chess is better for him or her than to spend the money on the slot machines.


If it is in your interest to really reduce animal suffering, then I suggest inspiration from such a Dutch political party ( http://www.partyfortheanimals.nl/ ), the program is very well expressed in this document: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2uTJsZrX2wI.
 
Please do not take my comments too personally, but attempt of your Party is reminiscent to me of the debate about whether the dry side of the turd is better than clammy. The turd will always remain the turd whether it's dry or wet, and the killing remains killing, whether they killed animals from factory farming or organic farms.


One more note to your program. On what basis do you think most carnivores could not survive healthy by transition to a vegetarian diet? I don't think all the carnivores were able to adopt a vegetarian diet. But not for the reason that it would be medically dangerous, but because they simply cannot imagine their life without meat, such as a smoker's life without cigarettes or an alcoholic life without booze. However, there are solutions, without any compromising in the form of killing. You can have a look here: http://www.vegetarianbutcher.com/ , http://bittman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/having-your-chicken-without-eating-it/ , http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/features/is-this-the-end-of-meat-7765871.html .

I hope that you do not find my comments insulting, and I am open to any further discussion.


I wish you good luck


Signed Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement


Author: Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement

Time: 10/12/2012


... I would be quite interested in your long-term scientific experiment with a lacto-vegetarian diet. It's this diet, which threatens your health or even the life? It is interesting that millions of vegetarians around the world are not at risk. Even the doctors today confirmed that a balanced lacto-vegetarian diet supplies the body with all the necessary materials. I personally know hundreds of vegetarians whose ancestors ate meat for generations and they still do not have any health problems.  ...

 
Signed Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement

 

Author: Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement

Time: 11/12/2012


... Again, I ask about the texts or the authority of the idea of eating the carrions (cadavers)? Where or whom is your claim substantiated? Vedic culture functioning under the rule of Kings in the territory of India and in other places thousands years ago very strictly limited eating the meat. In addition, the King took care of it, that this limit was respected. However, if someone could not give up meat eating, they could, under certain restrictive conditions, eat meat of goats, poultry and other lower animals. These population groups, however, have never been mainstream and worked more or less on the sidelines, that they do not disrupt the residents happy with a lacto-vegetarian diet. This information is very detailed in the Purā
as and in particular in the Bhágavata Purāa, also known as Srimad Bhagavatam, but also in many other places of the Vedic literature such as the Manu’s code-Manu samhita. ...


... you will be like the meat eaters banished to the sidelines and at best considered as uncivilized barbarians. ...


Signed Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement

The entire interview with the spokesman of the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement, in Czech, in pdf format, see:

http://www.spvzt.cz/HaraKrisnacelyrozhovor.pdf

or http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/HaraKrisnacelyrozhovor.pdf

 

8. Merciful diet of a woman – a mother and a child during pregnancy and breastfeeding

  
Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time:  20/09/2013 

Post:

quoted:
Post of Dalibor Grůza

Pregnant and breastfeeding woman may not survive healthy without food from dead animals (see my Philosophy of Balancethe chapter Appendices-Rational Mystique, End), but I cannot force her to eat my broiler carrions (cadavers), albeit after the autopsy by a veterinarian and boiled in several waters, not to impair the health and the life of herself and a child. However, at the same time, according to my Philosophy of Balance I may not needlessly sacrifice any living creature or cause unnecessary pain. Therefore, it is probably wrong according to my Philosophy of Balance, to have a baby with my wife on the condition because a woman or a child had to eat the food from slaughtered animals. Therefore, I have to fight until the last moment together with by me based political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures for the reform of legislation and the establishment of lawful business establishments for the production of animals carrions (cadavers) died of old age intended for the general public, which would not jeopardise their consumption of mother and child, so I could choose my eventual wife-mother with this diet from these carrions (cadavers).

It is a healthy diet at the same time allowing me a long life, at my age I have for fatherhood theoretically time up to 96 years of my age (woman on maternity benefits only to approximately 48 years of her age, so I have to give freedom to my former partner, who is now 41 years old, to find somebody else, because it is highly likely that I fail to establish this legislative reform within 7 years). If I then fail to establish the legislation reform, then it will mean the failure of my life that I'll be able to choose to seek a wife and our child, who will be at least during pregnancy and breastfeeding eating food from slaughtered animals, e.g., organic meat, becoming once again a mortal enemy of the sacrificial animals slaughtered and the subject of their revenge, and of their relatives.

Literature: http://www.novinky.cz/koktejl/281843-ind-se-stal-v-96-letech-nejstarsim-otcem-na-svete.html

quoted:
Post of Dalibor Grůza

It would be against the base of my psyche (i.e. among others I would mentally not survive) to be a deadly enemy of any living creature, if I caused a lot of possibly unnecessary (i.e. larger than the smallest) death and pain, e.g. if I had children at a cost of eating slaughtered animals by me, my partner or my offspring. This means that I could not and it probably would not, at least in my case, be correct to sacrifice friendship and love of all living creatures, when eating organic meat see above for that I had a child with a woman who at the time of pregnancy and breast-feeding had to eat organic meat. The beautiful is love of all living creatures, the terrible is mortal hatred of unnecessarily killed living creatures. This means that my only option to have a child with a woman is a legal reform for the purpose of selling the food from naturally dead animals, dead of old age, in normal stores for the safe consumption of such food for my wife and child during pregnancy and lactation.

(see http://www.spvzt.cz/ , http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ , http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/ )

Maybe I will have to be a deadly enemy of animals killed for and eaten by my possible pregnant and nursing woman and by my possible child at the cost of fratricides, i.e. the mutual murders among the people, whether it's me, my possible partner or my possible children (see Abel and Cain, and Adam and Eve in the biblical Paradise), but if any for now it is premature. I will be forced to choose this option when I consider it as necessary, i.e. my Philosophy of Balance, i.e. my theory of merciful nature, i.e. possibility of all living creatures to live in a world where everyone likes each other will be refuted.

If the above refutation of my Philosophy of Balance is not nor the above sale of carrions (cadavers) of animals died of natural causes, in principle, of old age in ordinary shops, nor my potential partner nor our potential joint child eating exclusively in the vegetarian way or from died animals only my as much as possible tested (carrions) of animals died of natural causes, in principle of old age (because my previous partner eats a lot of slaughtered animals and because in my experience it takes at least 3,5-7 years before martyred living cells and their related living cells forget predominantly their deadly enmity of human after his or her change to cause still the least possible death and pain, that she and also the baby were healthy, which my previous partner in the current age of 41 years until her age 48 years, i.e. her infertility can hardly make it, note: even according to science, as I later discovered, the living cells change completely except nerve cells in the human body once every 7 years, see http://hejnic.webnode.cz/jara/hlava/uceni/biologie-cloveka/ , http://knihovna.orgfree.com/kafka/5.html ) until my infertility, so I die childless from the above reasons,

And because I also in fact mostly want to live in a world where everyone likes each other (i.e. in paradise), therefore I am also still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain, it means, that I also in fact mostly do not want to cause a lot of unnecessary (i.e. much more than the least possible) death and pain (i.e. according to my existent experience, as I try to show in my Philosophy of Balance, my real main desire, virtually in my opinion the real main driving force behind the evolution of nature for other living creatures are not primitive instincts of self-preservation /more at males/  and to reproduce /more at females/, i.e. struggle for life and death, as taught by Darwinists, such as presented by Richard Dawkins in his work The Selfish Gene, but for both above a complex emotional relationship of mercy, virtually of love, i.e. symbiosis, i.e. “all living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other”,  see http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pud_(psychologie) , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoce , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruismus ) and I also do not want to suffer much before my death or to die prematurely (see single dogma of my Philosophy of Balance), and this even more than to have my own eventual offspring.

The above dilemma, according to my Philosophy of Balance seems to be the result of punishment of micro-organisms for my ancestors and my big causing unnecessary death and pain, especially of animals and for my own still causing almost exclusively necessary death and pain, that is, even though since 2008 I am almost exclusively frutarian, i.e. I eat almost exclusively only plant seeds and plant fruits and my animals eat vegetable products all mostly from contemporary standard parasitic rather than symbiotic plant agriculture, see my book: Symbiotic agriculture and experiments of natural science proving Philosophy of Balance . I hope this  dilemma will be solved by longer time of my  punishment  of celibacy and childlessness and my current transition, if possible, at least to plant products from organic vegetable farming and I will have later in life a partner and a child who during pregnancy and breastfeeding will eat from died animals exclusively safe naturally died carrions (cadavers) of animals.

See the Bible, New Testament, Matthew chapter 19 10 His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry. 11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. 12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

Analogous extreme example in nature, that Charles Darwin used as proof of alleged cruelty of nature and of the alleged inexistence of sovereign good God, when the living creature multiplies very mercilessly at the cost of life of other living creatures of the same order, it is a number of parasitic ichneumon wasps or emerald cockroach wasp, which lay their eggs in by them cruelly bred paralyzed insect. Paralyzed victim is changed in live food, which newborn larva of wasp eats gradually from the inside.

According to my natural scientific theory of evolutionary success of the individual as a result of friendship and enmity of micro-organisms that are able to recognize and remember their friend and their enemy, as well as a friend and an enemy of their related micro-organisms, so at present every child is born already with many enemies and subjected to a revenge for the death of animals cruelly died in industrial slaughter farms  to make this child just to become born,  it is a kind of original sin of this child.

To have or not to have a wife or a girlfriend and children for the above situation when people are parasites on animals as described above, it is not in my present opinion a matter of personal duty of human without exception (see the Bible: “And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth," (Gen 1:28), this their obligation without exception is valid only in paradise and it will exist after any establishment of paradise in the nature also by own forces of living creatures if possible), but rather a matter of personal choice of human under his or her circumstances between two more or less bad solutions.

(see  http://www.spvzt.cz/ , http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ , http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b/Matt/chapter/19 , http://www.scienceworld.cz/biologie/vosam-pri-kladeni-vajicek-do-housenek-pomaha-virus-4700/ , http://www.osel.cz/index.php?obsah=6&clanek=1716 , see genetics and especially epigenetics: http://www.scienceworld.cz/biologie/co-je-to-epigeneticka-dedicnost-3570 , http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/10267434268-epigenetika/ , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetika , http://www.wikiskripta.eu/index.php/Epigenetika , http://www.osel.cz/index.php?clanek=1516  , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy-Weinberg%C5%AFv_z%C3%A1kon ,  http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popula%C4%8Dn%C3%AD_genetika http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetika  , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C4%9Bdi%C4%8Dnost , http://www.imaturita.cz/maturitni-otazky/biologie/molekularni-zaklady-dedicnosti/356/ , http://www.novinky.cz/veda-skoly/320907-fobie-mohou-byt-jen-vzpominky-zdedene-po-predcich.html  , http://www.ksa.zcu.cz/podklady/bia3/Smarda_04-genetika.pdf , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weismann_barrier . http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mem , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarckismus , http://etext.czu.cz/img/skripta/68/042_061-1.pdf , http://www.uel.cz/download/Multimedialni_ucebni_text/zivotn_%20strategie_organismu.htm , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith , http://desirabilia.blogspot.cz/2014_07_01_archive.html )

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 02/02/2014 06:45:51

Post:

Women as the embodiment of snakes

 

According to Rational Mystique of my Philosophy of Balance all the living creatures after death compose various common persons with other living creatures.  Women are by this mystique of my Philosophy of Balance a tool of the Devil, or death, or the race of snakes, or they embody snakes, however women in fact mostly desire love, which the Devil, death, and snakes lack the most. Many snakes are different from other animals, because they cannot eat cadavers of living creatures, whether they died a natural death (i.e. carrions), or they were slaughtered e.g. by a human, and currently they must eat live prey. Currently the most merciful food for many snakes consists in various snails and shells, it is of evolutionarily less perfect living creatures that feel the least pain due to their relatively low perfect nervous system. However even snakes are according to Philosophy of Balance in perfectly infinite time designed gradually to perfection, i.e. to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, symbolically said even snakes are apparently God's creatures and God likes them therefore then, so women embody the rights of the most hated living God's creatures. Out of this nature the personal qualities for women arise, such as their generosity, courage, lack of fear, vindictiveness, deceit, vitality, seeking for similar brave men, predators, who do not fear them, tolerance to various sins of men and women, self-sacrifice, desire for power, disillusion of men, underestimating men who are more sensitive, they are not as brave and powerful as women as the embodiment of snakes.  However for all women as the embodiment of snakes is all those in fact accompanied by sometimes conscious (for evolutionarily more perfect women) and sometimes unconscious (for evolutionarily less perfect women) desire for love and to be loved as a tool of the Devil, virtually of the  death, virtually  as the embodiment of snakes, because they do not enjoy killing, power, or courage and they are longing for love, virtually they desire to return to the biblical paradise, virtually to make it in the world especially by our own forces. I was reconciled with my original girlfriend also, because I could not be alone anymore, even though from the above reasons I newly accept, that currently she will eat slaughtered organic meat, which I will not buy for her, but I will let her to buy it in the way, that I will buy for her a merciful herbal organic food and other merciful products such as clothing made from organic cotton and home eggs from breeding, where hens and cocks are dying of natural death, one do not let them to be slaughtered, in the way, that I will insist on her eating or possibly buying only organic meat within meat, which she already performs more or less, because at home they are breeding pigs for meat in the domestic breed and they grow the potatoes for themselves and for the pig, even if they have little money. And thereby we both become evolutionarily progressively more merciful, scavengers, later pure fruitarians.

 

In addition I would be a hypocrite, if currently I admit eating slaughtered organic meat for other people and currently I did not accept it at my own girlfriend.

 

Literatura: http://www.theguardian.com/science/video/2010/dec/07/snakes-snails-shells-evolution , http://daimon.webzdarma.cz/textb.htm , http://teraristika.chovzvirat.com/krmivo/krmeni-hadu.html (see  "Some snakes case is exactly the opposite and they do not hunt other than living and moving food or they do not eat other than it. They do not let to be deceived by the freshly killed or up-warmed cadaver.")

(See www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 15/02/2014 20:35:04

Post:

 

quoted:


Post of Dalibor Grůza

 

The problem of theodicea according to the Philosophy of Balance


According to the Philosophy of Balance in terms of the good and the evil the facts in our world can be defined as following items:

 

- the Good (the God)

- the Good Evil, i.e. the Evil of the Good (the Devil of the God, or the Devil belonging to the God, it is a necessary evil)

- the imperfect Good (the God of creation, the God belonging to the creation, it is the imperfect good of people and of other living creatures)

- the imperfect Good Evil (the Devil of the God belonging to a creation, it is the imperfect Devil belonging to the God, or it is an imperfect necessary evil, or an evolutionarily-developmentally necessary evil, or what we perceive, and according to the Philosophy of Balance, i.e. apparently, what appears seemingly to us as a real evil contradictory to the substance of the good, all-powerful sovereign, omnipresent God-the Good)


Literature:

See English: the Go(o)d, the God, the Evil, the (D)evil.


Teodicea (from French théodicée, from Greek theos, God and dikaios, righteous), it means the justification of the God. It is the old problem of philosophy and theology, and it concerns the presence of evil in the world. The key question is, why the God, if he is omnipotent and good, commits evil? See: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teodicea


(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )


 

I.e. according to the Philosophy of Balance all living creatures are the imperfect good, whether in the form of the above imperfect good or imperfect good evil (whether a number of parasitic ichneumon wasps or emerald cockroach wasp, which lay their eggs in by them cruelly bred paralyzed insect, paralyzed victim is changed in live food, which newborn larva of wasp eats gradually from the inside, i.e. the example in nature, that Charles Darwin used as proof of alleged cruelty of nature and of the alleged inexistence of sovereign good God, or the snakes, many of which must eat only live prey, or predators, particularly carnivorous predators, or the monkeys or prehistoric men, whose gangs are killing each other, or Adolf Hitler, who replaced the suffering to animals in factory farms with  suffering in particular to Jews and Roma, or the Jews, who as in all spheres of human activity chosen people of world leaders committed, that in today's world the people breed animals in a slaughter factory agricultural farms or in experimental laboratories of medicine or of cosmetics companies-current concentration camps of the animals, although they condemn their own concentration camps, by which Adolf Hitler apparently revenged this suffering to animals).


(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

 

On March 13, 2014 6:30 corrected 13/06/2014, "JUDr. Dalibor Gruza Ph.D.-lawyer" wrote:

I have found out already, what is my major disadvantage in relation to women, I cannot even admit from my psychological and also from my current moral reasons unlike other men to feed my possible offspring with slaughtered animals, it is a question, whether I am ever able to feed them, in terms of philosophy of mercy it may be a crucial evolutionary advantage, in terms of Darwinism it is clearly a crucial evolutionary disadvantage, my current crucial problem is therefore, whether the Philosophy of Balance, i.e. the philosophy of mercy or Darwinism is true, which only the future seems to show. If I have not conceive with my current partner a child till her age of 48 years or if she does not start to eat till her age of 44,5 years, i.e. 3,5 years before her probable infertility (see above) and does not persist then till her death in eating only the same as I do, I cannot guarantee her my fidelity, but then we will still probably remain together, because no other fertile woman will probably admit to feed our common possible child from meat only with carrions.

Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 18/08/2014 21:32:01
Post:

quoted:


Post of Dalibor Grůza 19/07/2014

My Philosophy of Balance of workable symbiosis of all living organisms in nature is according to the majority of people considered as highly improbable even though their attractive option, as the result others are willing to invest in this option a lot of time and resources, if in the end after all it succeeds. According to the majority of people it is in my case very probably a futile experiment, which must end eventually by a total failure, because the nature is outside the family and often even inside the family cruel, even if they do not like it. As I am not predatory, because I could not stand mentally or physically this cruelty, the majority of women is not willing to risk having a child with me and they would not eat slaughtered animals, from the required dead animals they would eat only carrions that died of natural causes, principally of old age. Therefore highly probably according to the majority of people I will die childless and therefore, if others followed my Philosophy of Balance, so living organisms would become extinct highly probably according to these people. Thus my Philosophy of Balance cannot be followed probably according to the majority of people, although probably due to it, which according to me partially proves it and up to now justifies it for me, I succeed in stabilization of my serious health condition up to now, even if the stabilization seemed in terms of health statistics previously highly improbable, further in being above-average successful in my professional life and in getting above-average property. However according to the majority of people it is highly probably transient and unrepeatable phenomenon that stems from the fact, that others are willing to invest in verifying of my Philosophy of Balance as the above mentioned most attractive option a lot of time and resources, although it appears to them to be highly improbable in the unmerciful nature. Therefore now the main question is, whether respecting of my Philosophy of Balance as the law of mercy to all living organisms ensures me a success in the rest of my life, nowadays especially if I succeed in having children with my partner, and they would not eat slaughtered animals.


I have no greater certainty, that the Philosophy of Balance is true, than the above justifying experiences, if I want to get a wife, so I should not let know any of my anxiety from the stress while making decisions based on the Philosophy of Balance. The most merciful diet, as possible i.e. on principle organic frutarianism and eggs from a home breed, where they do not slaughter or get slaughtered any hens and cocks I eat minimally since 25 May 2013, when my partner was about exactly 41 years old and I was about 40 years old. If the Philosophy of Balance is valid, so the friendship of the world living microorganisms ensures me, that in the future I have the potential partner and potential offspring, who would not eat slaughtered animals, from the required dead animals they would eat only carrions that died of natural causes, principally of old age. As in 7 years from 25 May 2013, if I continue to follow the above most merciful way of food as possible, the living cells will change completely in my body and in 3,5 years of this time half of the living cells in my body will apparently change (see above), therefore in the first case of this period all living microorganisms in the world and in the second case of this period the vast majority of living organisms in the world will be my friends and they arrange it, so that in the future I gain the potential partner and potential offspring, who would not eat slaughtered animals, from the required dead animals they would eat only carrions that died of natural causes, principally of old age. Ideally in the last moment I can accomplish it with my current partner, for whom from 25 May 2013 exactly 7 years remain till her infertility and 3.5 years till the need to change her diet and to eat only the same as I do. Otherwise the Philosophy of Balance is not valid.

Literature: Elliot Katz, Being The Strong Man A Woman Wants, Práh 2008, first edition, Příběhy Tóry Patnáct biblických zamyšlení, Jan Divecký, nakladatelství P3K, 2005, Everyman's Talmud The Major Teachings of the Rabbinic Sages, Abraham Cohen, Sefer s.r.o., 2006, http://blogeurabia.parlamentnilisty.cz/Blog/joanjjoanj/Print/1023-talmud-ideologii-zbaveny.aspx , http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375&whichpage=52

9. Prognosis of the future of World politics and of political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 10/02/2013 09:26:15 corrected 06/09/2013

Post:

 

- Death and pain of living creatures, in particular livestock caused by modern agricultural factory farming must be compensated by similarly high death and pain caused to responsible people in the future. It follows future revenge of the tortured to death and their related micro-organisms in the form of the insolvency of the banks (under the law of the European Union it is supposed to be 75% of the assets managed by the banks formed by sooner or later worthless Government bonds of sooner or later over-indebted States of the European Union), economic crisis, war inciting, arms race and wars or the collapse of the currencies and the general misery, mutatis mutandis, as was the case during the great depression during the onset of fascism in the 20th century.


It can be assumed that, as a result of the economic crisis we are directed to the collapse of the Western international integrity in today's democratic base and the emergence of a number of smaller local powers apparently disposing nuclear weapons controlling only their immediate surroundings, these smaller power States will be often based on dictatorship, like fascist or worse Nazi States of the twentieth century. German Nazism has in the program eco-fascism, therefore a great protection of animal welfare and organic farming, which is reflected also in the program of today's far right.


- To compensate for the above great death and pain of living creatures in the suffering of responsible people with which any of the above local powers and dictatorial States arising after the above today and expected future global economic crisis could learn, acquire compassion and enact the slaughter tax and start the regrowth of the economy and the reunification of the whole international community.


- In the above turning point of learning of the suffering of the responsible people previous education of the slaughter tax must be available.


- The slaughter tax brings the largest profit only in the long term, in the short term it is less acceptable for the people, it is difficult to understand and to explicate, and therefore the above education cannot be in the form of a shock, but based on a long-term and fair explanation that there is plenty of informed people in the above turning point.

- People, who have long-term compliance with the obligation to cause the least possible death and pain, will live also in the aforementioned crisis like in the biblical paradise.

 

- If we understand all living creatures as predators or parasites (see Satanism), then peace is possible in the world only as in the Roman Empire (see violent order maintained by the pack of leader predators on a large territory), according to the Philosophy of Balance with the prognosis of development as in the Roman Empire (i.e. large amount of deadly enemies and progressive degeneration of the pack of leader predators increasing their effeminacy, i.e. combat disability).


(see http://www.spvzt.cz/ , http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ , http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/ )

 

10. The legal rights of viruses, bacteria and parasites in general, by SPVŽT

 

How do we have treated the rights of viruses, bacteria and parasites in general? Or we are denying their rights to life? ...

 

Dalibor Grůza: ...Rights of the viruses and bacteria have been treated at least of all, because it is the evolutionarily simplest known organism, that almost do not sense pain, yet even in their case, our aim would not be their extinction. The aim of the ideology of the Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures (SPVŽT) in relation to the parasites in general is not to extinct all parasites, because it would be inconsistent with the main ideological duty of each to the constant causing the least possible death and pain, but the ideological aim of SPVŽT in relation to parasites in general, is a well known principle in biology, that a successful parasite is one that does not kill its host, ideological goal is, therefore, generally speaking, the symbiosis between the parasites and other live creatures.

...


Dalibor Grůza: It depends on if I have in my hair one louse, then it apparently has the right to life in my hair, or if there will be a thousand of them, then I must apparently extinct them, on the other hand, parasites generally always react on their killing to their excessive reproduction and their resistance against extinctive resources also increases. So even due to parasites in general by me, there are above two ways, the war on life and death, or symbiosis.

...
see http://www.facebook.com/dalibor.gruza #!/pages/side-for-all-living-creatures/133671120130073

11. Good adviser, or solicitor and his or her client

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 26/03/13 04:49:58

Post:

...
A good adviser, or solicitor should advise a client on how to be a good, religiously speaking, belong to God (the words of dobrý-good and Bůh-God have the same language origin, in English such as the consonant root of G-D, dobrý-good, Bůh-God). The good of the client means to me the balance of considerations of justice, of mighty and of love or mercy in the affairs of a client. Focusing only on one of the above aspects of good of client and his or her adviser is not good, in particular, in the long run for the client nor for his or her adviser and, in particular, in the long term it is punished by nature, and its evolution from my natural theory about the ability of all micro-organisms to recognize and remember the friend and the enemy. In other words, treasurer (religiously speaking, similar to the Lord - Treasurer, in English spoken judge, Lord of hosts, i.e. of all living creatures, from the Russian word gosudar - Treasurer, composed from “go”, probably from the Latin word host, see in Czech nebeské zástupy - in English the hosts - army of heaven and “sudar”, or judge), who is only just and they are not mighty and merciful, or the treasurer, who is only powerful and not just and merciful, or treasurer, who is only merciful and not mighty and just, are bad treasurers-landlords, not like the Lord.

An example of bad advice was apparently present ecclesiastical restitution in the Czech Republic, where the Church and the Government parties chose apparently only the aspect of power, without apparently sufficiently taking into account the aspect to be merciful, and just to all the people of our State.

(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

12. The question of Judaism from the viewpoint of Philosophy of Balance

 

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 28/06/13 10:22:47

Post:

The Jews are the chosen people, because apparently thanks to their the most merciful diet of all people in earlier times (see Old Testament relationship to animals and Kosher slaughter) they perfected genetically, so that they were in an unusually large part of their population the leading group of all people, virtually of this world managed by people, in all spheres of human activity. Be a leader, however, is not only the advantage, it's a huge responsibility for much in excess of the liability of the average member of human society, the beloved leader of the pack of wolves will be protected by a pack of wolves at the cost of their own lives, the hateful leader of the pack of wolves the pack of wolves will eventually eat alive after his defeat by another wolf. The cause of anti-Semitism in modern times so I can see, in that the society, led by the Jews in modern times, in addition to leaders from other nations, is causing a huge amount of unnecessary death and pain, in particular of other living creatures than humans (Old Testament relation to living creatures and Kosher slaughter are not the most merciful as possible for a long time), thereby the Jews cause according to Philosophy of Balance huge amount of their deadly enemies and hatred from the killed ones and their relatives live micro-organisms that are, from evolutionary reasons, part of the bodies of all living creatures and also of people, and thus it also initiated their anti-Semitism. Because of by the Jews led modern-times society caused the great death and pain, in particular of other living creatures than humans the anti-Semites, in turn, celebrate the great death and pain caused to these Jews.

My personal attitude towards Jews is as follows: the initiated anti-Semitism is in me because of the great death and pain, caused by modern-times society led by Jews, of other living creatures than humans, in particular of animals. At the same time, however, Jews as leaders of human society are very close to me as a philosopher and lawyer, i.e. as the leading scientific member of the human society, I have a very strong emotional collegial relationship to them. If there will be no change to the current state of the human society, then from my Philosophy of Balance a future revenge on the Jews for a large number of martyred and their relatives living micro-organisms, in particular of animals, implies, thus the future great emergence of dictatorships and anti-Semitism in the world. Even me as a body made up of, inter alia, those live micro-organisms I will have a subconscious visceral pleasure from this vengeance and extermination of the Jews in the future. But from my Philosophy of Balance it implies, that, if I do not want to be like them – Jews, I have to still cause the least possible death and pain, and even of the Jews, therefore, I have to protect the Jews and to help them as far as possible against these by me expected their great death and pain in conflict with this my subconscious visceral pleasure of vengeance caused to Jews.

The leaders of other nations are from the viewpoint of living microorganisms more protected against the above revenge by genetic relatedness to the led nation or by lower frequency of these leaders in relation to their nation.

The above is the interpretation of the Bible Deuteronomy 28,58-69, in terms of Philosophy of Balance:

58 If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, The Lord Thy God; 59 Then the Lord will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance. 60 Moreover he will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt, which thou wast afraid of; and they shall cleave unto thee. 61 Also every sickness, and every plague, which is not written in the book of this law, them will the Lord bring upon thee, until thou be destroyed. 62 And ye shall be left few in number, whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude; because thou wouldest not obey the voice of the Lord thy God. 63 And it shall come to pass, that as the Lord rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the Lord will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it.

64 And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone. 65 And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest: but the Lord shall give thee there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of mind: 66 And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and shalt have none assurance of thy life: 67 In the morning thou shalt say, Would God it were even! and at even thou shalt say, Would God it were morning! for the fear of thine heart wherewith thou shalt fear, and for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see. 68 And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you. 69[29,1] These are the words of the covenant, which the Lord commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the land of Moab, beside the covenant which he made with them in Horeb..

(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

13. Romany politics according to the Philosophy of Balance

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 31/08/2013 20:57:30

Post:

 

The only Romany politics, which was successful, was in the framework of the pre-war Slovakia, which was manifested by the position of the Slovaks on gypsies during the fascist Slovak State. While all the Jews were released by the Slovak fascists to concentration camps, in Slovakia almost all gypsies survived the period of fascism and the holocaust, without the Slovaks releasing them to Hitler´s concentration camps. The base for this in the history unique success of the Romany politics in Slovakia was, that in Slovakia in the vicinity of the poor Romany settlement there was always richer village of Slovak farmers, where each richer Slovak farmer had under the patronage one poor Romany family. To this patronage Romany family the richer farmer gave remains of his or her economy and for that his or her patronage Romany family guaranteed that no one steals the crop on the fields of Slovak farmer-patron. In addition, that the fields were guarded, so in the case, that a theft had occurred, so this patronage Romany family was obliged to denounce to a richer Slovak farmer-patron the offender, who was then sentenced to prison. Although the Romany settlement held together, it had a strict hierarchy, that they chose to denounce, in principle, a kind of scapegoat, often into Romany settlement from outside married Romany men or gadjo (non-Romani), who stood in the hierarchy in the Romany settlement the lowest, so the thefts on the fields of the Slovak richer village were only in exceptional cases. Further patronage Romany family helped a little to his or her richer Slovak farmer-patron, but not too much, because the gypsy, who is not like the gadjo (non-Romani), considers work as dishonorable and he or she better does not work, when he or she need not.

When in Slovakia and in Europe the fascism won, so every Slovak farmer, how he or she could the most, protected his or her patronage Romany family. The result was that in Slovakia about 99% of gypsies survived the holocaust in the relative safety during the Second World War. For example, to deceive Hitler and his Romany murdering politics the Slovak State enacted some sort of discriminatory laws against gypsies who may not be moving, however, no one respected these laws in real life in Slovakia. This can stand against the Holocaust of the gypsies in Bohemia and Moravia, where the Czechs collaborated much with the Nazis in murders of Czech gypsies, and nearly all of the Czech gypsies were killed here, if during protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia the Czech Romany doctoral family of Holomeks wanted to save their life, so they had to ran away to relatives in Slovakia. Whereas in the Holocaust almost all Czech gypsies were massacred by Nazis, today's Czech gypsies are the descendants of those who moved here from Slovakia after the war, and the proof is that all gypsies in the Czech Republic speak Slovak Romani.

The second source of Romany politics according to the Philosophy of Balance is the Romany culture. The Romany fairy tales are very cruel, one of such Romany fairy tales tells the story of stupid good gadjo (non-Romani), who wanted to be friend with the clever gypsy. Stupid good gadjo went to the market with a cow, he met the clever gypsy, with whom he started to want to be friend, first the clever gypsy stole from him the cow, then all the money and then he picked out him his eyes and he left him to his fate.

From the above-mentioned sources there are the following principles of the Romany politics towards gypsies, who have not regular employment or do not practise business or do not regularly go to school (gypsies, who have regular employment or do some business or go to school regularly, do not need the below patronage or protection and they are completely equal in the level of socialization with gadjos, i.e. non-Romani), according to the Philosophy of Balance:

- Giving gypsies the minimum social benefits just, so that their families would survive, with the widest possible State retraining and State school education also in later life, but not to let them die of hunger, thirst, cold, or from lack of health care.

- At the same time, each gadjo (non-Romani) family in the vicinity of a Romany settlement should have under the patronage one of Romany families, which would guarantee, that the gypsies from a Romany settlement will not commit against this patron non-Romany family any criminal activity, otherwise they would have to denounce and help convict the offender or they are being cut down on the above social benefits.

- Patronage non-Romany gadjo family should have the obligation to do everything to guarantee the patronage Romany family, that they did not die of hunger, thirst, cold or lack of health care in spite of low social benefits. They could for example assist them in the negotiations with the competent authorities or by the advices.

- I recommend, that the patronage gadjo family is not befriended as an equal with its patronage Romany family, but always there would be the relationship of the superior non-Romany patron and Romany client family.

- Unemployed gypsies on the above low social benefits should be guaranteed by the law for their work, if they make some extra money, fair wages, to learn to appreciate the work and to recover, and not to exploit them, and so regardless of the specificities of the Romany work, here I am mainly referring to the uncertain attendance of gypsies into employment.

Source of information on the Romany culture and history: Sources of the Museum of Romany culture, Bratislavská 67, 60200 Brno, which I visited about 2-3 years ago, I studied and earned information there.

(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

14. Educational politics according to the Philosophy of Balance

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 20/09/2013 08:57:31

Post:

 

The main aim of education should be to educate towards the mercy of everyone in the society. Intelligence of society members represents the wealth of society, which is to be used in the context of the necessary extensive system of quality State education of society members even in the case of the poor members of society, at the same time it allows also to clever, i.e. on principal to more sensitive members of the society to take a beneficial place in society even due to their sensitivity. The society member, that gets education for free or inexpensively, should recognize, that they obtained their education for free or inexpensively, which does not serve to robbing the society of living creatures, but primarily for their benefit, i.e. for the relatively cheap service to society. In contrast the expensive, in particular higher education leads to the waste of the society's cleverness in case of its poor members and to expensive service to society by the educated members of society.

Therefore basic and secondary State education should be for free, because it is used by almost all people in society, and the State higher education at a cost of up to 10.000,-CZK per year of study at the University in relation to any field of higher education, this price, though apparently far from covering the cost of this education, would serve as a motivational element, that the State University study was not abused. At the same time the State should provide interest-free loans, increased only about inflation on the cost of higher education for the poor members of society, which the student was obliged to repay only if they achieve a certain predetermined amount of their income. At the same time as today the main universal aspect of the admission to a State school should be to meet at the best the learning potentials of this school by a member of the society, not their ability to pay for this study.

(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

15. Collective responsibility and vaccination against viruses

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 28/09/2013 20:49:15

Post:

 

Related living cells (i.e. for example people) are cooperating genetic groups, if according to my hypothesis any living cell recognizes and remembers the enemy in a living cell, which or of which group causes a lot of unnecessary (i.e. much more than the least possible) death and pain (for example a certain person), so the enmity, virtually hatred of injured living cell and its relative living cells extends also to the genetically relative living cells of the damaging living cell with decreasing force by the distance of the relationship (i.e. for example an evil human, his or her family, his or her nation or all people) and they revenge also on those living cells with decreasing force by the distance of their relationship. In my opinion this is the basis of collective responsibility in society, which could be described as a liability (i.e. punishment or reward) of individual for the conduct of its group and group liability for the conduct of its individual, both while requiring according to my Philosophy of Balance to perform steady obligation of everyone to cause the least possible death and pain.

Example of the above-mentioned collective responsibility is such, that humans produce vaccines against viruses of fatal, incurable diseases such as rabies, so that these viruses are grown in tissue culture, thus live cells grown extracorporeally. These living cells of tissue cultures are fed essentially inter alia also by fetal bovine serum, which means blood serum from the fetus of bled calf separated from the cow in the late stage of her pregnancy, during which both the fetus and the pregnant cow are often killed, which is terrible, but less terrible than, when human dies for example of rabies. This fetal bovine serum is the best food for tissue cultures, which is currently used. This fetal bovine serum can be probably always replaced by serum from the blood of live animals, such as newborn or young calf, which are bled (letting the vein), without having to kill them. However in the present also that serum is obtained from a slaughterhouse blood of slaughtered newborn bulls which are not worth continuing to feed and breed for the current farmers, because they do not give milk. This blood would otherwise have ended up in the waste stream during bleeding of newborn bulls slaughtered for their meat to be sold in stores of contemporary human society.

This means, that although we use vaccine against viruses not using fetal bovine serum but bovine serum, we bear the above-mentioned collective responsibility for that the blood serum is not extracted without killing an animal, but killing a newborn bull in slaughterhouses. To reduce the penalty of that our collective responsibility we must fight, inter alia, for the enactment of the by me proposed Act on slaughter tax to pay off to feed and breed also newborn bulls to their natural death without the intentional killing by any human, in order that those vaccines used blood serum obtained by letting the vein without killing the newborn or young bulls.

An even better solution is probably non-animal serum, because according to the notice of DVM. Jan Dolezal jan.dolezal@merck.com from Intervet s.r.o. a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA as "maintenance medium" in the production of Nobivac Rabies vaccine , which is one of the most effective on the market - revaccination every three years, anything of animal origin is not used, because according to the notice of technical manager of the parent company from USA: The previous medium we used for producing the rabies antigen contained various substances of animal origin; tryptose and lactalbumin hydrolysate (both contain milk derivatives) and bovine serum albumin.  The veggie medium we now use contains none of these animal-derived components. We cannot of course supply specific formulation details of the veggie medium as this is commercially confidential information. Certain doubts may occur only that, according to perhaps outdated technical information (see Literature listed below), on the other hand, most tissue cultures grow in serum-free media worse than in the media with serum. Often it is also necessary to "accustom" to grow cell culture in serum-free medium" - the cells are first cultured in a conventional media with serum and then the medium is gradually replaced by the media with low serum and serum-free medium. Among other the company Merck & Co. produces also vaccines against viruses in human medicine. Vaccination of dog at a vet in the Czech Republic against rabies is about 200, - CZK, 1 dose of vaccine Nobivac Rabies about 35, - CZK, 1 dose of other merciful vaccine CANVAC R-annual revaccination from DYNTEC s.r.o., apparently not produced from bovine fetal serum but from bovine (blood) serum, is about 9, - CZK.

A similar example of above collective responsibility is, if in the present human society the human earns money from us and this human uses products from slaughtered animals, this provision of necessary earnings is now in many cases the least possible harm.

Note: The above problem with the blood serum does not arise for a vaccine against the bacteria that are cultured on agar medium, which is a plant product.

Literature:

http://spisy.upv.cz/Patents/FullDocuments/226/226097.pdf , http://biologie-v-kostce.blogspot.cz/2011/05/243-kultivacni-podminky.html , http://3pol.cz/1101/print , http://www.nechybujte.cz/ , http://www.biotech.cz/cz/eshop/katalog/4472/sera , http://bioprojekty.lf1.cuni.cz/3381/sylaby-prednasek/textova-verze-prednasek/bunecne-kultury-vejrazka.pdf , http://is.muni.cz/th/101933/prif_b/bakalarska_prace.txt , http://www.dokapsy.cz/vzteklina/ , http://www.cmku.cz/soubory/dokumenty/300_seznam_schvalenych_vakcin_proti_vztekline.pdf , http://www.viamilkcz.cz/documents/obchodni_cinnost/cenik_veterinarnich_lecivych_pripravku_platny_od_9_7_2012.pdf , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vzteklina#L.C3.A9.C4.8Dba_a_progn.C3.B3za_u_lid.C3.AD , http://www.wikiskripta.eu/index.php/R%C5%AFstov%C3%BD_faktor , http://bioprojekty.lf1.cuni.cz/3381/sylaby-prednasek/bunecne-kultury.pdf , http://www.hedvabnastezka.cz/help-camp/8963-ani-moderni-medicina-neumi-vylecit-vzteklinu/


(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

 

16. Whom did I vote in the parliamentary elections in October 2013?
  

According to the steady duty of everyone according to my Philosophy of Balance to cause the least possible death and pain the mankind can avoid radical retribution for our causing of the great unnecessary (i.e. a lot bigger than the smallest possible) death and pain, especially to animals only by radical limitation of this needless death and pain.


Therefore, I voted for the Green Party, namely by circling of the vegetarians in the Green Party ticket in the constituency of South Moravian region, and those are:


2. RNDr. Mojmír Vlašín 58 Brno (he eats only overpopulated animals shot by hunters in the forest, he does not eat slaughtered animals from industrial agricultural farms, my note from my own findings)

Environmentalist, lecturer, expert witness


6. Mgr. Martin Ander, Ph.D. 38 Brno (vegetarian for 20 years, my note from my own findings)
Teacher, mathematician, Member of the Municipal Council of the city of Brno


10. Mgr. Michal Rezek 37 Dolní Loučky (vegetarian, my note from my own findings)
Manager of the audit firm.


The Green Party is not ideal for me, because it combines the protection of animals in the program with a lot of unnecessary clutter, the majority of the members does not have compassion for animals, maybe at least for people and they are not vegetarians, they reacted very negatively to my proposal of the slaughter tax, as a member of the Green Party.


Yet at  present the vegetarians of the Green party are according to me the only hope to avoid revenge of martyred animals in industrial agricultural farms in the form of by me expected collapse of Western economies, the fall of the Western democracy and the rise of fascism and Nazism in the Western world, and to the constitution of by me founded Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures, advocating the slaughter tax in each State of the world.

 

The Program of Green Party includes marginally also passages of the protection of animals:


We will increase the availability of meals without animal products. We want to make such a diet was well available in all schools, factories and public canteens, hospitals, social care institutions, prisons and other facilities. In the establishments operated by the public administration we establish the obligation of the availability of one vegetarian dish.


We recognize the right of individuals to the free decision about eating habits. Vegetarianism or veganism often stems from a substantive change in belief or religion. Moreover, livestock production is a major ecological burden and some of its practices are also ethical problem.


Livestock production requires three times more space than intensive crop. Livestock farms emit one fifth of global greenhouse gas production, which is more than all the cars, ships and planes produce. These farms also produce large quantities of fecal pollution. It is also problematic overuse of fertilizer for the production of feeding stuffs for animals; feed (primarily corn and soy) are, moreover, very often genetically modified, without the end customer has had the opportunity to find out. Corn and soy are frequently imported into the Czech Republic from Argentina and Brazil, where their cultivation is causing irreversible damages.


The worldwide increasing demand for livestock products is colliding with the available biological capacity. For these reasons, we welcome any efforts to limit the consumption of animal products and we support sustainable ways of eating, that is trying to limit or to exclude animal products altogether, such as vegetarianism and veganism.


However we do not and we will not impose a diet of the people with the exclusion of certain products. We only effectively allow their choice and inform about its usefulness. Well proportioned vegetable diet can provide everything for the body needs, and may also be effective in preventing many civilization diseases.


We significantly strengthen and increase effect of support of organic agriculture and organic food. We promote local organic food production, that ecological agriculture was significant reservoir of healthy foods and not just a consumer of its subsidies. We offer organic food in school canteens, hospitals, medical and social institutions, and State institutions.

 

Development of organic farming we support by tax advantages at organic food. We support the development of innovative concepts (eg. Harvested, community farming etc.). In addition to the quantity of food it is necessary to put emphasis on their quality, for the protection and harmonious development of the countryside and to ensure better living conditions for animals.


Organic farming is one of the means for sustainable development, therefore we support the development of organic farms and theo increase of the share of ecological agriculture on the total area of agricultural land. The majority of organic food has come from imports; therefore we will support the production of local organic food that the Czech agriculture does not lose not unnecessarily the opportunity.


We keep the obligation that the municipality takes care of abandoned animals and animal shelters.


Shelters for abandoned animals have a problem coping with the increase in abandoned animals, they lack the capacity, qualified personnel and finances. Shelters so often are not capable of receiving the animals from other catchment areas or from private finders. The existing legislation provides that a municipality is obliged to finance the placement and stay of the animal at the shelter. If the animal does not find the owner within six months, the owner becomes the municipality. In the case of tortured animals the municipality provides the alternate location of the tortured animal.


The municipality is sometimes trying to avoid this obligation and favors the economic interests before the ethical. The Greens disagree with the proposal to shorten the six-month period, after which the municipality is obliged to take care of the animal and the cost of care. While we do not agree with the proposal that the municipality had been the law free from compulsory funding of shelters, such a step would be for shelters de facto the liquidation.

 

We propose to extend the grant of subsidies for the operation of shelters and at the same time, we will support the proposal on areal castration of stray animals, especially cats, provided that it is in the interests of animal welfare, in order to avoid an increase in the number of stray animals. At the same time to support projects for the creation of rescue centers for sick and handicapped pets.

 

We reject the attempts and the testing of cosmetics on animals, we encourage the introduction of alternative methods of testing in the industry, science and medicine.


We also want to make better use of the European Centre for the validation of alternative methods, more supported research of these methods and their implementation in practice. We agree with the European ban on the testing of cosmetics and we demand that it covered even the testing of products for the home. We support the modern and reliable alternatives to experiments on animals, such as computer models, cell cultures, molecular methods, samples of human tissues, studies on volunteers, population studies and organs of already dead animals.


Under the legislation, an alternative method should be used as soon as it is approved. In practice, however, this regulation is seen as an alternative to be used at the moment when it is internationally recognized and commonly available (which takes a number of years). Another problem is the fact that the development of new alternative methods and their implementation in practice is not financially enough supported.


We will enforce a ban on the use of wild species of animals for performances in circuses and variety shows. We do not agree to the registration of circuses with animals on the list of intangible cultural heritage of UNESCO.

 

Dressage and performing of wild animals in circuses is already banned in Belgium, Austria, the Netherlands, Hungary, Slovenia and the UK. In Greece, then apply a complete ban on the use of animals in circuses. In the Czech Republic the circuses use for their performances as wild animals as domesticated animals. However, these animals in circuses are living in poor and degrading conditions.

 

The animals are proven to suffer from stress and behavioral disorders. Dressage, which is carried out on all the circus animals almost from birth, includes violence and coercion against the animals, often even corporal punishments or withholding of food. Circuses does not meet the educational function, because they show to children animals in unnatural conditions and their unnatural behavior, which is invoked when the stress and fear of punishment. Children receive biased information about the fact that the animals are doing everything voluntarily or as a reward. Attempts to write to UNESCO are rather evidence that Czech circus loses the attractiveness, reducing their attendance and looking for ways to keep circuses with animals in the Czech Republic.


We cancel the statutory exception to the protection of animals against cruelty, which allows the slaughter of animals without prior stunning from religious reasons.


A complete ban on ritual slaughter of animals by the law already established Poland, Switzerland, Sweden, Latvia and Iceland. In other European countries, such as Belgium and the Netherlands there is the legislative process for the adoption of such a law.

 

The Greens support the freedom of religion and respect religious customs, but also support the right of animals to a dignified and painless life, which prevails over religious practices. The stunning of the animal before slaughter is legally ordered due to animal suffering. Nowadays, we consider such practices to the slaughter of animals for unethical and unjustifiable.

 

In the framework of the common agricultural policy (CAP) of the EU we will promote farming with higher levels of well-being (welfare) of the animals. We establish a ban on the transport of animals for slaughter at a distance greater than 300 kilometers and a ban on their movement through the territory of the Czech Republic. We establish a complete ban on breeding fur animals in the Czech Republic.


We want to eliminate the exceptions in the Act on the protection of animals concerning farm animals, which allows castration without anesthesia, teeth cutting, dehorning, amputations of tails, burning beaks, etc. We improve the living conditions in the breeding of dairy cows by standardizing their protection. We promote measures to assist to a gradual transition from intensive livestock production to sustainable and humane methods of livestock farming.


We propose that the so-called farm animals were slaughtered as close to their original breeding or rearing and transports of animals were as short as possible up to a distance of 300 kilometers. Current status allows you to transport live animals through the territory of many countries after dozens of hours in harsh conditions. Fur animals are forced to live in completely unnatural even drastic conditions, where they cannot fulfill even the most basic necessities. Taking into account all the negative externalities, the fur trade, fur production shows such as totally inefficient.

Literature: the nominee of the Green Party in the South and other regions: http://www.zeleni.cz/jihomoravsky-kraj/ , http://www.zeleni.cz/program-zdrave-prostredi-kvalitni-potraviny-zdrava-krajina-cisty-vzduch/

 

17. Why to participate in, virtually not to avoid politics!

 

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 16/10/2013 16:14:54

Post:

 

Politics can cause many bad things but also a lot of good. If you want to save a human or an animal such as tortured in the current industrial agricultural factory farms or other one living creature, you can do it yourself, if you want, however, to save all, you can do it only in politics, the worst thing is, that the politics can cause, however, also a large number of their unnecessary killing or their great unnecessary pain. If a merciful human does not participate in, virtually avoids politics, so he or she gives space, that politics cause a number of unnecessary (i.e. more than the least possible) death and pain.

 

(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )

 

18. Differences and sameness in objective value of all living creatures

 

Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 02/03/2013 06:42:30
Post:

 

kirmakX6on

 

According to me you are right that every living creature has the same objective value that they have the potential to be a perfect neighbor to all living creatures, and different objective value according to how well they perform a steady duty of all living creatures to cause the least possible amount of death and pain, therefore according to the amount of by them caused death and pain and the amount of pain and death, which they saved from living creatures, or in other words, it is a quantitative ratio of their real enemies and real friends among the living creatures, or even in other words to get back to your interpretation it is their developmental stage of their potential to be a perfect neighbor to all living creatures.

 

(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

 

19. Position of Philosophy of Balance on racism

 

Author: Dalibor Grůza

Time: 06/01/2013 14:33:42

Post:

(quoted from  http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1664&whichpage=2 )

quoted:


Post of Dalibor Grůza

Axel,

all modern humans are probably derived evolutionarily from the same small group of people from Africa, from where our ancestors set out around the world, which archeology and genetics found out. These our ancestors had probably all black skin adapted to bright African sun. The whitening of the skin of Europeans was caused then by their genetic adaptation to the lack of sunshine in Europe compared to Africa, white skin is sensitive to the sun, also a smaller amount of sunlight can be more perfectly used for the benefit of the body by it than black skin, the aim is to protect the body against the bright sun.

Literature: http://www.novinky.cz/veda-skoly/286446-nejvetsimi-mutanty-na-zemi-jsou-evropane-odhaluje-nova-studie.html


Axel,

... question is, whether it is wrong to be racist. In terms of evolutionary science it is the question of monogenism, thus the origin of all the people from a small group of related people, virtually monkeys and polygenism, thus the origin of different races from different groups of monkeys. Then at polygenism there is a question of the quality of different groups of our ancestors, i.e. value ​​of different races. The monogenist was apparently also Charles Darwin and it is a prevailing view in contemporary evolutionary natural science. The polygenist was also the German evolutionist Ernst Haeckel, who was also the inspiration of many Nazis. The Nazis understood then an evolution of humans as purely Darwinian battle among the human races of different origin for survival in history.

The solution is not according to me a tendency either to polygenism as contemporary evolutionary Nazis, virtually Neo-Nazis do nor to monogenism, also monogenism does not solve the problem of Darwinian-based historical struggle for survival among different races regardless of the fact, that in history they have possibly a common ancestor. Furthermore the decision between an accuracy of monogenism or polygenism will remain probably questionable until the end of human history.

The solution is according to me the change of Darwin's theory of evolution presented by my Philosophy of Balance that the goal of evolution, manifested increasingly with increasing evolutionary perfection of every living organism, is not fighting for its life with other living organisms, but as much as possible most perfect symbiosis with them. This is a consequence of driving rule of natural evolution, which has to be according to the Philosophy of Balance the ability of living organisms to recognize and remember their friend and enemy. Then the ultimate goal of natural evolution should not be the extinction of certain human races, virtually other species of living organisms, but still more perfect symbiosis among them.

Literature: http://www.cojeco.cz/index.php?s_term=&s_lang=2&detail=1&id_desc=74797 , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_African_origin_of_modern_humans , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygenism#Modern_adherents , http://www.komsomol.cz/clanky/1900_fasismus_03.html , see blue eyes and light skin color of Europeans: http://www.novinky.cz/koktejl/322881-sobum-vezoucim-santu-se-ma-zhasnout-a-zatemnit-okna-radi-vedec.html , http://www.novinky.cz/zena/deti/289916-barva-oci-se-meni-az-do-tri-let-zelene-oci-jsou-temer-vzacnosti.html , http://www.novinky.cz/veda-skoly/286446-nejvetsimi-mutanty-na-zemi-jsou-evropane-odhaluje-nova-studie.html , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soci%C3%A1ln%C3%AD_darwinismus ,  http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_p%C5%AFvodu_druh%C5%AF )

(viz www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )

20. Whom would I vote in the municipal elections in Hustopeče 2014

In the municipal elections in Hustopeče 2014 I recommend to vote by circling for candidates supporting green policy across all candidate entities in Hustopeče.However everything can be wasted without better attitude to the animals and support of the slaughter tax. ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Petition

for the adoption of the following draft of the law on the slaughter tax

 (see http://www.spvzt.cz/Peticeporazkovadan.html)

 

RADICALLY RESTRICTING THE CONSUMPTION OF PRODUCTS FROM SLAUGHTERED ANIMALS AND RADICALLY DISADVANTAGING AGRICULTURAL FACTORY FARMS FOR SLAUGHTER OF LIVESTOCK-TODAY'S CONCENTRATION CAMPS, CAUSING THE WORST SUFFERING OF ANIMALS AS OPPOSED TO THE FAMILY HOME ANIMAL AND ORGANIC ANIMAL BREEDS ALSO FOR THE PURPOSE OF SLAUGHTER WITH THE ULTIMATE AIM OF BREEDING ALL LIVESTOCK UNTIL THEIR NATURAL DEATH, ON PRINCIPLE OF THE OLD AGE AND CONSUMPTION OF SO OBTAINED NATURALLY DEAD CARRIONS OF ANIMALS (after the autopsy of the veterinarian and on principle boiled in several waters) INSTEAD OF SLAUGHTERED ANIMALS AND TO HELP PEOPLE IN EXTREME NEED IN OUR COUNTRY AND IN THE WORLD

Below the Act on slaughter tax deals with the real resolution of three main shortcomings of current Western democratic states and Western civilization, which in the past enacted in their territory basic natural human rights and freedoms. These three shortcomings are as follows. Firstly, it is necessary for Western democratic states to ensure, that in developing countries nobody had to die because of hunger, thirst, cold or lack of health care. The second of these shortcomings of Western civilization is, if on their territories people are dying of hunger, thirst, cold or lack of routine health care. The third deficiency of Western civilization is the relationship of people to other living creatures, in particular to animals at present.

Below the Act on slaughter tax is based on the natural right of every living creature to live a dignified, happy and long life and to death almost without mental and physical pain on the basis of a fair law to be replaced the struggle for life in society of living creatures by their friendship for life and death.

1. Draft of Act No. ...

on the slaughter tax

Preamble

The purpose of this Act is to take real responsibility of a man for the slaughter (killing) of animals to these animals and the actual gradual restriction of unnecessary killing of animals by man. The purpose of this Act is also taking more responsibility for the fate of people at risk of starvation and severe malnutrition diseases, both in the Czech Republic and abroad. The purpose of this Act is also a genuine improvement in living conditions of livestock in the interest of humanism. 

§ 1

Subject to tax

(1) The following taxable goods are subject to slaughter tax: the body or body parts, including blood from slaughtered (killed) animals for this purpose, or contained in any foods for the purposes of this Act within the meaning of the Act on Food and Tobacco Products 1) or non - food goods from slaughtered animals, which have not been properly taxed by the slaughter tax. The subject to slaughter tax are also animals as taxable goods which are exempt from the slaughter tax (§ 1 subsection 2 of this Act) to be delivered later to be killed by others to non - business natural persons. Non - food goods for the purposes of this Act shall mean all products and goods except for food.

(2) The subjects of the slaughter tax are not home animals slaughtered in the family home breeding of natural persons (further as family home breeding), where these breeds do not exceed the total of more than 84 kg usual body weight of animals at slaughter to a family member for the calendar year subject to the condition below. For the family for the purposes of this Act it is considered the family as defined by the Act on State Social Support 4).

§ 2

Exemption from the slaughter tax.

(1) Medicinal products within the meaning of the Act on Medicinal Products 2) are exempt from the slaughter tax.

(2) It is also exempt from the slaughter tax for the calendar year:

 63 kg of taxable goods-food per person-member of family, if the decisive family income reaches the subsistence of the family or less, 42 kg of taxable goods-food per person-family member, if a decisive family income is greater than one times and less than or equal to twice the amount of the subsistence of the family, 21 kg of taxable goods-food per person-family member, if a decisive family income is more than twice and less than or equal to three times the amount of family subsistence. In the case of a shorter period than the calendar year the above exemption from the slaughter tax applies on proportion of the above weight. Act on the Life and Existence Minimum provides the amount of subsistence 3). Decisive family income is defined in the Act on State Social Support 4).

(3) An exempt person may apply the exemption from the slaughter tax in writing at the competent tax authority, subject to subsection 1 of this provision, soon after 1 calendar month and, subject to subsection 2 of this provision, after the first calendar quarter. This person may apply the exemption from the slaughter tax in writing no later than at the end of the following calendar year. The competent tax office shall refund to the exempted person the paid slaughter tax within 30 days from their proper exercise of the right, in particular documented by accounting documents for the purchase of exempt taxable goods and paid amount of the slaughter tax. 

§ 3

Registered persons

(1) Business slaughter (killing) of animals may be done only by legal and natural persons who are registered with the tax office as slaughter taxpayer.

(2) Persons who import in their business to the Czech Republic taxable goods from other tax territory within the European Community they must be registered with the tax office as taxpayers before delivery.

(3) Persons, who sell to the Czech Republic from abroad taxable goods through distance selling, they must be registered with the customs authorities within 15 days of the sale of goods, even if they are not taxpayers. 

§ 4

Slaughter tax rate

(1) The general rate of the slaughter tax on taxable goods-food is 100 percent of the selling price including VAT of taxable goods forming foods. The rate of the slaughter tax on non - food taxable goods is 200 percent of selling price including VAT of taxable goods forming non - food goods.

The rate of slaughter tax in the case of taxable goods from organic farming under the legislation governing organic farming):

for the food is 10 percent of the selling price, inclusive of value added tax taxable items forming the food and

for non - food taxable goods is 20 percent of the selling price, inclusive of value added tax taxable items forming the non - food goods.

The rate of the slaughter tax on animals, that are not subject to slaughter tax (§ 1 subsection 2 of this Act) to be delivered later to be killed by others to natural persons, is 10% of the price paid.

The condition for the application of both of these preferential rates of the slaughter tax, is that these animals are 2/3 of their lives from birth until slaughter in these farms, or in organic stock farming, othervise the general rate of the slaughter tax from the selling price of the goods shall apply and in family home farms after deduction previously paid, slaughter tax general rate of the slaughter tax from the usual price of the goods.

 

The rate of the slaughter tax in the case of taxable goods of halal and Kosher slaughter of animals, there is in addition a 750 percent of selling price inclusive of value added tax of taxable goods.

(2) The reported selling price of taxable goods shall not vary more than 10 percent of the normal price in terms of the valuation of property 5). The selling price of 1 kg of meat for cattle, poultry and piglets and pigs is for cattle the price of slaughtered bodies (JUT) at cold, the price of chilled and frozen poultry and for pigs and piglets the price of cold slaughtered bodies (JUT) announced at the pricing reports of State Agricultural Intervention Fund on the basis of relevant legislation 6).

(3) Required taxable weight is the net weight in kilograms at a temperature of less than 2 degrees Celsius for slaughtered animals and 20 degrees Celsius for live animals.

§ 5

Tax period

Tax period for the taxable goods is one calendar month. 

§ 6

Arise of obligation to declare and pay slaughter tax

(1) The obligation to declare and pay the slaughter tax arises through slaughter (killing) of the animal in the Czech Republic or import of taxable goods to the Czech Republic.

(2) The obligation to declare and pay slaughter tax there is also

a) on detection of losses exceeded the standards set for taxable goods during animal slaughter and movement of untaxed taxable goods,

b) date of the finding illegally taking away untaxed taxable goods during slaughter of animals, from stores or during a transport,

c) the date of acquisition, sale or detection of untaxed taxable goods by legal or natural persons who store or transfer or otherwise dispose of untaxed taxable goods that are subject to the slaughter tax with the exception of taxable goods exempted from slaughter tax or not subject to slaughter tax (§ 1, subsection 2), or the detection of the untaxed taxable goods, which legal or natural persons manufactured without authorization, and at the date that occurred before or

d) in the case of termination of activity at least one day prior to the application for striking off the register or an application for cancellation of business license, tax concerns the untaxed taxable goods and all products containing untaxed taxable goods which are to this day owned by the payer who manufactured, bought or imported the products, with the exception of untaxed taxable goods exempted from slaughter tax or not subject to slaughter tax (§ 1, subsection 2). 

§ 7

Tax return to the slaughter tax and due date of the tax

(1) Taxpayers have an obligation after the tax period and not later than 25th day of the following month to declare and pay the slaughter tax for the taxable quantity of goods, that taxpayer made pursuant to § 3 subsection 1 of this Act by the slaughter of animals during the calendar month and that taxpayer received pursuant to § 3 subsection 2 of this Act during the calendar month. Other manufacturers and importers of taxable goods are required to declare and pay tax before slaughter (killing) of the animal or before delivery of the goods to the Czech Republic. The person or persons must sign submission as the taxpayer.

(2) The competent tax authority may impose upon the taxpayer, who has repeatedly failed to pay the slaughter tax in time, the obligation to pay the slaughter tax in a shorter period. The competent customs office or tax office may also require that the tax payer pays the slaughter tax in shorter period, or require the provision of the adequate advance payment to grant the slaughter tax

(3) The competent customs office or tax authority may impose upon the tax payers, purchasers of imported taxable goods referred to in § 3, subsection 2 of this Act, who has repeatedly failed to pay the slaughter tax in time, the obligation to grant tax before the delivery of the goods to the Czech Republic. The competent customs office or tax office may also require that taxpayers, purchasers of the goods referred to in § 3, subsection 2 of this Act pay the slaughter tax before delivery of goods to the Czech Republic.

(4) If a tax return is not submitted within the deadline, the competent customs office or tax authority may suspend the registration of person until the lacking notification will be delivered to the competent national authorities. Failing to pay the payable slaughter tax by the 14th day after the payment deadline, the competent customs office or tax authority may suspend the registration of the person, until appropriate slaughter tax is paid.

(5) The Ministry of Finance may lay down more rules for granting and payment of the slaughter tax. 

§ 8

Determination of taxable weight

 (1) In business of persons registered under § 3, subsection 1 taxable mass for payment period is determined on the basis of the issuance from the premises of a taxpayer during the period in which the goods were manufactured by taxpayer. If the current untaxed taxable goods in stock made by tax payer or supplied here for resale are less than the difference between the quantity of produced or delivered as follows untaxed taxable goods and amount of the issued untaxed taxable goods, the shortfall in the amount must be accounted for output.

(2) In business of persons who are registered according to § 3, subsection 2, the measurement of taxable weight is based on the amount of the supply of untaxed taxable goods to the business at a time, when from abroad outside the Czech Republic such goods come into the business without paying the slaughter tax. 

§ 9

Slaughter tax on goods from abroad

 (1) For taxable goods imported from outside the tax territory of the European Communities one pays the slaughter tax. The slaughter tax is paid according to the rules of the Customs Act 7).

(2) In other cases a slaughter tax is held in connection with the supply of imported taxable goods here in the Czech Republic.

§10

Persons who enjoy the privileges and immunities under international treaties

For exemption from the slaughter tax of taxable goods beneficiaries of protection under international law and the goods imported by persons located or residing outside the Czech Republic, enjoying privileges and immunities under international treaties the provisions of the Customs Act 7) are applied. The slaughter tax return for beneficiaries of the privileges and immunities the Consumer Tax Act 8) shall apply mutatis mutandis. 

§ 11

Accounting Provisions

 (1) Taxpayers must keep records of supply of taxable goods and the expenditure of taxable goods. Businesses producing taxable goods, must also keep records of raw materials and production of taxable goods.

(2) Taxable goods which taxpayer receives, for which it has already been paid the slaughter tax, they must be separated from the held stock of taxable goods of business, from which the slaughter tax was not paid.

(3) In any transfer of taxable goods one is required to issue a document indicating the name and address of the payer, possibly exemption from the slaughter tax, price and type of taxable goods, amount and taxable weight. The deliverer must keep a copy of the document 5 years after the transfer or dispensing goods.

(4) Packaging of any product 10) placed on the market must contain, if the product contains any proportion of taxable goods, the visible sign of the proportion of taxable goods as a percentage, i.e. the weight ratio of taxable goods contained in the product being marketed to the total weight of any product as a percentage.

(5) The Ministry of Finance may further lay down rules on accounting of slaughter tax payers and on documents on the transfer of taxable goods as described therein.

§ 12

Slaughter tax on compensation.

(1) For goods under the customs tariff value, which themselves are taxable under this Act or have taxable goods, the slaughter tax on compensation shall be paid on imports from outside the tax territory of the European Community. The slaughter tax on compensation is charged pursuant to the provisions of the Customs Act 7).

(2) For purchase of goods from other countries in the tax territory of the European Communities the slaughter tax on compensation shall be paid in respect of delivering taxable goods here in the Czech Republic.

(3) During the customs clearance, dispensing or receiving of goods it is necessary to give the mass of taxable goods (declaration of the manufacturer must be submitted), and further the amount of the selling price and type of taxable goods.

(4) In the event, that the selling price of taxable goods differs more than 10 percent of the normal price in terms of the valuation of assets 5) the slaughter tax is calculated on the basis of customs and tax determination of weight and of the normal price concerning taxable goods.

(5) If the declaration by the manufacturer fails, the slaughter tax is calculated on the basis of the taxable goods amounting to 50 percent weight of the goods and the use of the rate of the most taxable part of compulsory taxable content of goods. If the State customs and tax authorities asses, that the slaughter tax, calculated on the actual content of compulsory taxable goods, should be at a higher level than so determined, the slaughter tax is calculated by customs and financial government authorities on the basis of a determination of the mass, the type and the usual price of the taxable goods. 

§ 13

Control provisions

 (1) The State customs and tax authorities are entitled to carry out checks on those businesses and those who are obliged to comply with the obligations established by this Act, to inspections of inventories, books, other accounting materials and a correspondence and others of firms.

(2) Persons affected by control, business owners and employed persons of businesses must provide to State customs and tax authorities the necessary assistance in carrying out the checks referred to in subsection 1

(3) The material referred to in subsection 1 shall be issued upon request or send to national customs and tax authorities.

(4) Suppliers of raw materials and packaging for those producing taxable goods which are required to pay the slaughter tax according to this Act, shall on request notify to the State customs and tax authorities information of their goods supply to businesses that produce taxable goods.

(5) Entrepreneurs must notify on request to the public customs and tax authorities the financial data on their purchases of taxable goods for businesses.

(6) The State customs and tax authorities are authorized to carry out checks on goods in transit if the goods within the business are sold abroad or moving to other than registered taxpayers.

(7) The State customs and tax authorities are authorized to carry out checks on goods stores and accounts, etc at businesses referred to in subsection 3 to 5

(8) Police of the Czech Republic provides to national customs and tax authorities the assistance in supervision.

(9) During the inspection under this Act one shall proceed as for other control activities performed by the competent authorities under special legislation, which sets out its mandate.

(10) The Ministry of Finance may establish rules concerning the control operations that are necessary to implement the Act. 

Administrative offenses

§ 14

It is prohibited to manufacture, import, sell or otherwise transfer, offer for sale or transfer the untaxed taxable goods by persons other than registered tax payers, except for goods which isn´t a subject to slaughter tax (§ 1, subsection 2) or exempt from this tax. 

§ 15

(1) A natural person commits an offense, if in the tax territory of the Czech Republic he or she acquires or produces or imports to this territory untaxed taxable goods except for goods which isn´t a subject to slaughter tax (§ 1, subsection 2) and exempt from this tax. For this offense may be imposed a fine up to 25 000 CZK.

(2) A natural person commits an offense, if in the tax territory of the Czech Republic he or she acquires or produces or imports into this territory within the activity with the showing signs of unauthorized business untaxed taxable goods except for goods which isn´t a subject to the slaughter tax or exempt from this tax. For this offense may be imposed a fine up to 5 000 000 CZK. 

§ 16

(1) A legal or a business natural person commits an administrative offense, through that this person:

a) submits false or confusing information and will protect the anonymity of data for taxable control,

b) violates § 3 subsection 1, 2, § 7 subsection 1, § 9 subsection 1, 2, § 11 subsection 1 to 4, § 13 subsection 2, 3, 4 or 5 and § 14,

c) does not respect the orders granted in connection with § 7 subsection 2, 3,

d) continues the business covered by the obligation of taxation, where the registration is invalid or suspended under § 7 subsection 4, and the State customs and tax authorities notified the person of that,

e) will take over, will secure or will appropriate goods in the open market value of at least half a million Czech crowns, of which the slaughter tax is not paid which should have been paid under the Act or this person tries it.

(2) For the administrative offense pursuant to subsection 1 letter a) to d) a fine up to 1 000 000 CZK shall be imposed.

(3) For the administrative offense pursuant to subsection 1 letter e) a fine from 1 000 000 CZK to 50 000 000 CZK shall be imposed. 

§17

(1) A legal person is not responsible for an administrative offense, if it proves, that this person made every effort that could be required to prevent the violation of legal obligation.

(2) In determining the area of fine of legal person one shall take into account the seriousness of the administrative offense, especially the manner, in which this person committed it, and its consequences and the circumstances under which it was committed.

(3) The liability of legal persons for an administrative offense shall be forfeited, if the administrative authority has not commenced proceedings within 1 year from the date, on which it is found, but no later than 3 years from the date, on which it was committed.

(4) Administrative offenses the competent territorial financial authorities proceed, the administrative offenses for import of illegally untaxed taxable goods the customs offices and customs directorates proceed. If an administrative offense the more competent administrative authorities shall proceed, the administrative offense will be proceeded by it, which found first a breach of obligation or prohibition, and if an administrative procedure is initiated, so the administrative body which initiated the administrative proceedings sooner.

(5) For the responsibility for conduct that occurred in the business of a natural person or in direct connection with it the provisions of law on liability and sanctions of legal persons are applicable.

(6) The fine is payable within 30 days from the date, on which the decision becomes final, by which it was imposed. Fines are collected by the authority, which imposed them. The Financial Authority executes fines. Revenue from fines is the income of the State budget. A decision imposing a fine can be executed within 5 years after the deadline for its payment. 

§ 18

Forfeiture and seizure of secured taxable goods

(1) The administrative body responsible for processing administrative offence imposes the forfeiture of illegal untaxed taxable goods found during inspections under this Act, if

a) belong to an administrative offense offender and

b) were used or intended to commit an administrative offense.

(2) If it is not ordered forfeiture of things referred to in subsection 1, the decision of seizure will be, if

a) they belong to the offender, who cannot be prosecuted for an administrative offense,

b) they do not belong to an administrative offense offender or they do not belong to an owner wholly or

c) the owner is unknown,


and by putting it into circulation, when taking into account their quantity, the harm could be done to the economic interests of the State protected by this law.

(3) The offender of an administrative offense, who was imposed the forfeiture, or the person, with whom illegally untaxed taxable goods were seized one shall impose an obligation to compensate the State the costs associated with the management and transfer or destruction of forfeited or seized illegally untaxed taxable goods.

(4) The decision on the seizure of thing and on the obligation to reimburse the State costs associated with the management and transfer or destruction of illegal untaxed taxable goods cannot be appealed.

(5) The owner of forfeited or seized illegally untaxed taxable goods becomes the State. Customs or tax office sells the forfeited or seized illegally untaxed taxable goods or destroys them, if it is not successful to dispose of them. Three-person committee designated by the customs and tax office director from employees supervises the sale and destruction, who work in this office.

(6) If the secured illegally untaxed taxable goods are not declared forfeited or seized they shall be returned without undue delay to that who owns undoubtedly them, or otherwise to that, from whom they were taken. 

§ 19

Using funds from the slaughter tax

(1) The funds obtained by collection of the slaughter tax, after deducting the costs associated with State administration and collection of slaughter tax, they belong exclusively to the State Agricultural Intervention Fund 6), which is required to use these funds as follows.

(2) At least half of these funds the State Agricultural Intervention Fund shall use for grants to fund program 9), which will be specifically set up, that manufacturers and service providers of business related to the slaughter (killing) factory fading of animals could switch over to other ways of doing agricultural business including organic slaughter farming in accordance with the legislation governing organic farming 12) and to improve living conditions of livestock in the interest of humanism and due to the urgency of the individual grant according to the amount of unnecessary death and pain of the animals excluded by this funding.

(3) At the most half of these funds the State Agricultural Intervention Fund shall be use for the implementation of intervention purchases of food of agricultural crop farming and livestock production, which is not associated with the slaughter of animals, and providing storage or processing of agricultural food purchased as above. For sale or other method of transfer of such interventionally purchased agricultural foodstuffs or products resulted from processing of such interventionally purchased agricultural foodstuffs the State Agricultural Intervention Fund must always give priority to food assistance for people at the risk of starvation or severe malnutrition diseases, whether in the Czech Republic (the homeless), or in other states. These sales and transfers the State Agricultural Intervention Fund is entitled to carry out with due diligence on favorable pricing conditions or free of charge.  

Common and final provisions

§ 20

For the payment of the slaughter tax under provisions of this Act the one is liable, who, as the owner, lesser or similar is operating business at his or her own expense, including imports of goods designated according to § 9, and the one, who owns the goods. 

§ 21

For the purposes of this Act one means the tax territory of the European Communities the territory established by the relevant legislation of the European Communities. 11) The territory of the Principality of Monaco is considered as the territory of the French Republic, the territory of Jungholz and Mittelberg (KleinesWalsertal) is considered as the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany, the Isle of Man is considered as the territory of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the San Marino is considered as the territory of the Italian Republic. 

§ 22

Ministry of Finance will issue a decree to implement the relevant provisions of this Act referring to.

§ 23

This Act shall take effect on ...

2. Links to the text

1) Act No. 110/1997 Collection on Food and Tobacco Products

2) Act No 378/2007 Collection about drugs and changes in some related Acts (Drugs Act)

3) Act 110/2006 Collection Life and Existence Minimum

4) Act No. 117/1995 Collection State Social Support

5) Act No. 151/1997 Collection about Property Valuation

6) Commission Regulation 1249/2008, Act No. 256/2000 Collection about the State Agricultural Intervention Fund and the CR Government Regulation No. 249/2004 Collection

7) Act No. 13/1993 Collection Customs Act

8) Act No. 353/2003 Collection on Consumer Taxes

9) Act No. 218/2000 Collection on Budget Rules

10) Act No. 477/2001 Collection on Packaging

11) Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February on the general arrangements for the holding, movement and monitoring of products subject to consumer tax, as amended by Directives 92/108/EEC, 94/74/EC, 96/99/EC, 2000/44/EC and 2000/47/EC

12) Act No. 242/2000 Collection, on organic farming, the European Council Regulation EC 834/2007 on organic farming and Commission Regulation 889/2008

The explanatory memorandum to the draft of Act on the slaughter tax 

The preamble and § 19 of the Act 

Act on the slaughter tax shall remedy the current deficiencies of three main shortcomings of current Western democratic states and Western civilization, which in the past enacted in their territory basic natural human rights and freedoms. These three shortcomings are as follows. Firstly, it is necessary for Western democratic states to ensure, that in developing countries nobody had to die because of hunger, thirst, cold or lack of health care. The second of these shortcomings of Western civilization is, if on their territories people are dying of hunger, thirst, cold or lack of routine health care. The third deficiency of Western civilization is the relationship of people to other living creatures, in particular to animals at a present.

The guiding permanent principle of the slaughter tax is, that man and other legal entities still caused the minimum of unnecessary death and pain of other living creatures, in this case of animals. Conflicting views of the impact of vegetarianism on human health, especially for children and pregnant women, however, we do not allow a direct ban on goods originating from slaughtered animals. We need to go through successive steps, where the impact of the gradual reduction of consumption of goods is verified, virtually food from slaughtered animals due to increasing rates of the slaughter tax on the health of human population.

As an example India can serve us, where the average age 67,5-70 years (see CIA World Fact book 2008 Estimates for Life Expectancy at birth (years), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy ), here most of people has no money for basic medical treatment and there they die reportedly e.g. for appendicitis. What would be the average age if there would be good public health and health insurance as in the Western world? Therefore India can serve for us as an example of a high average age in the case of a genetic adaptation to vegetarianism for many generations because of here dominant Hinduism (According to the report of UN Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations-FAO, see http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y4252E/y4252e05c.htm , India's meat consumption is very low - currently 4.5 kg per capita - and it has grown by only 1 kg in the last 20 years.). The combination of vegetarianism and Western health care would probably be possible in future with a gradual genetic adaptation of Western populations to vegetarianism to achieve a much higher average age than today, and both in the west and in the developing world. So it is to bring a much fairer society as for the people in the west and in the developing world, as well as for livestock.

Intensive "animal production" requires approximately 25 times more land for production of food unit in comparison to when the same unit of food is obtained from plant sources. (Fr. John Dear, S.J. Cesta za Ježíšovým nenásilím, www.vegetarian.cz ).

Every day worldwide 15 thousand children die due to malnutrition. This is much more, than those killed in wars and natural disasters. The number of these children is still rising, UNICEF informed that is engaged in the help of children in immediate danger to life. The countries with the highest incidence of child malnutrition are North Korea, Zambia, Burundi, Nepal, Afghanistan, Yemen and Ethiopia. All of these countries have the incidence of child malnutrition in children less than five years over 50 percent. (See http://aktualne.centrum.cz/clanek.phtml?id=159572 ) The Jean Ziegler, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Ziegler , “The Right to Food: Report by the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Mr. Jean Ziegler, Submitted in Accordance with Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2000/10”, see http://hei.unige.ch/~clapham/hrdoc/docs/foodrep2001.pdf , United Nations, February 7, 2001, p. 5. “On average, 62 million people die each year, of whom probably 36 million (58 per cent) directly or indirectly as a result of nutritional deficiencies, infections, epidemics or diseases which attack the body when its resistance and immunity have been weakened by undernourishment and hunger.”

The World Food Program (World Food Program) devotes this issue, which is the world's largest humanitarian organization in the fight against hunger. WFP is a part of the United Nations and it is funded voluntarily.

WFP works in Africa (Algeria, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic, Congo, Ivory Coast, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Swaziland, Gambia, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe), in America (Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Peru), in Asia (Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Georgia, India, Indonesia, Korean People's Democratic Republic, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste) and in the Middle East (Iran, Iraq, Jordan, occupied Palestinian territory, Syria, Yemen). (see www.wfp.org)

At most 50% of collected funds from the slaughter tax determined for food assistance can be directed for example in collaboration with UNICEF and WFP in particular to the above mentioned countries.

People consuming animal products from killed animals would be justified by the payment of the slaughter tax also morally before the own conscience and also before the society because the collected slaughter tax would serve to save the lives of hungry people. And thus people have learnt to appreciate life and to save other living creatures and to take the real and legal responsibility to all people and other living creatures.

To § 1 subsection 2 and §§ 2, 3, 19 of the Act

According to opponents of vegetarianism the lack of meat and other food from slaughtered animals may cause following disease in humans adapted to receive these foods: Kwashiorkor, Endemic goiter, nutritional anemia, Rickets (rachitis), Osteomalacia, Osteoporosis (see Vegetariánství a sport, Bachelor thesis of Martina Niederle led by Ing. Iva Hrnčiříková, Masaryk University, Faculty of Sports Studies Department of Health, Brno 2008).

Therefore until resolution of this contradiction by gradually reducing the consumption of these foods from animals due to rising rates of slaughter tax it is necessary to enable people and animals adapted to this food from slaughtered animals to receive it among other through the exclusion or exemption from the slaughter tax depending on their financial income, if they do not have sufficient financial income.

Furthermore, it should be a radical disadvantage of agricultural factory farming of animals for the purpose of slaughter-today's concentration camps, causing the worst suffering of animals as opposed to home family and organic farming of livestock also for the purpose of slaughter.

Among other things, one-tenth rate of the slaughter tax for goods from organic slaughter breeding, because they are more merciful, and exclusion or exemption from the slaughter tax of family home breeds of farm animals for the purpose of slaughter of 133 kilograms live weight of an animal for a member of the household and a year, because those members of home breeders have to bred animals fundamentally personal relationship on the basis of personal care for farm animals as family members. 

The same tax rate of organic farms and the livestock delivered to the home family farms has to prioritize the education of these farm animals from the baby, when at the time of taxation at the time of delivery of the animal to the home breed this animal has a minimum mass as opposed to an adult animal.

At least half of the revenue of the slaughter tax will also be tied purposely by the Act on the slaughter tax for subsidies to more merciful agricultural organic breeds, in relation to the urgency of the individual grants according to the amount of unnecessary death and pain of animals excluded by this subsidy, i.e. the largest subsidy will be directed to the implementation of projects to improve the welfare of animals in most cruel slaughter and in most cruel farms, such as halal and Kosher slaughters and the slaughter agricultural factory farms.

The rate of slaughter tax from halal and Kosher slaughters of animals is, moreover, very high, because it is the most cruel currently legally permitted slaughters. The aim is to reduce these most cruel currently legally authorized animal slaughters, the second goal is that both Jews and Muslims have a moral, legal and financial responsibility for these merciless presently legally permitted slaughters, because the whole of the slaughter tax yield is by the Act on the slaughter tax tied to the subsidies for the agricultural organic more merciful also slaughter breeds and to help people in dire need, as I argue above.

To § 6 subsection 1 and § 9 of the Act

According to Article 1, point 3 of Council Directive 2008/118/ES from 16 December 2008 on the general arrangements for consumer taxes and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC Member States may levy a tax a) on products other than goods subject to consumer tax, b) on the provision of services, including those relating to goods subject to consumer tax, if such tax shall not be characterized as turnover tax. The selection of these taxes must not lead to border-crossing formalities in trade between Member States. Therefore it is not possible to make for the slaughter tax the obligation to declare and pay the slaughter tax on the transfer of taxable goods across borders of the Czech Republic in case of imports from other countries of tax territory of the European Community.

4. Interview: Meat tax - utopia or a solution? 

Is the idea of a meat tax utopia or a solution? Will pain and suffering be taxed, which are hidden in each hamburger or a plate with steaks? So after reading the following interview, where the questions of Vegetarian.cz editors are answered by JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., a lawyer, a philosopher – an author of the idea of so-called meat tax, we might learn more.  

First part of the interview

Vegetarian.cz: Meat tax, this is a joke, right?  

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: Fun is tenseness alternated by relaxation. In this case, however, it is not possible, because now living creatures are dying which shall not die at all. Today, for example, animals are legally considered as mere things, with that our cruel treatment of other living creatures is connected. Why should a living creature die with impunity, when it is not absolutely necessary? Therefore, meat tax, so let anyone, who kills an animal, to pay for it, let people learn to appreciate life and to save other living creatures. 

Vegetarian.cz: Hm ... Could you further explain?  

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: It would probably be an indirect tax, where taxable transactions should certainly be primarily from the sale of meat and other products from slaughtered animals, such as blood, bone, skin, fur, etc. Another taxable transaction would be the sale of live animals for slaughter (e.g. piglets for home and factory fattening pigs), animals for medical experiments of pharmaceutical companies, or animals for experiments of cosmetic companies, even though I would prefer a total ban in the last case.

Taxable transaction of meat tax would cover therefore all cases, where there is killing of animals. Tax is levied from the provider of taxable transactions and the percentage would be added to the price of output and subtracted from the price of entry similar to VAT. People would be exempt for health reasons from the meat tax. The main purpose of the meat tax would be for man to take finally the legal responsibility to other living creatures that are at a lower evolutionary level than a man, of which development the man has to manage to universal benefit under keywords still to cause the least possible death and pain.

At the same time I realize, that carnivore cannot live without meat (because organic matter eats each other), so the meat tax does not serve as a ban of meat eating, but its limitation in its above basic purpose still to cause the minimum death and pain in the nature. The tax rates of meat tax should also be adjusted to this basic purpose, these rates should increase with evolutionary maturity of killed animal, i.e. with the increasing perfection of the nervous system and so it is its increasing ability to feel pain, therefore, to suffer physically and mentally. This means the lower rate of meat tax for killed fish and birds than for killed mammals.

Vegetarian.cz: What exactly would be the purpose of tax?

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: The aim of the meat tax would be restrictions on the consumption of products from the killed animals. Livestock production is causing a greater share in the creation of greenhouse gases on our planet, thus it burdens greatly the environment. Increased consumption of meat has according to current researches negative impact on health and the length of human life, imposing their spending on the social and health system of each country.

Restriction of livestock production would also allow giving the freed capacity to pay production of plant foods such as cereals and to save so many lives in a starving third world. In my opinion, killing living creatures is also behind the litigiousness of today's world, the question is not, for example, what led to the firing of a terrorist bomb in a crowd and killing, but the question is why in our world one kills at all, why in our world one must ever die.

Vegetarian.cz: What is your answer to this question?

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: As to me the answer, that every unnecessary death of any living creature in our world, increases hatred and litigiousness in our world. Meat tax thus represents a payment for the above-mentioned external costs of killing other living creatures, which remain outstanding otherwise and they represent for the future in terms of economy the financial burden.

(I would also like to thank here for their valuable suggestions for my project of meat tax provided to me by members of my parent organization Brno-center of Green Party).

Vegetarian.cz: Thank you for the first part of an interesting conversation.

REDACTION http://www.vegetarian.cz/rozhovor/dgmdan.html

5. Interview II. Meat tax - Utopia or a solution? 

Is the idea of a meat tax utopia or a solution? Will pain and suffering be taxed, which are hidden in each hamburger or a plate with steaks? So after reading the following interview, where the questions of Vegetarian.cz editors are answered by JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., a lawyer, a philosopher – an author of the idea of so-called meat tax, we might learn more.   

Second part of the conversation 

Vegetarian.cz: Do you think, that your proposal will be properly understood?  

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: In the previous post, I worked with the meat tax from the point of view of prevention of the damages, i.e. as payment for any external costs to the environment and society as a significant greenhouse gas emissions from animal production, deterioration of health of people who eat too many meat products, and increasing aggression and ruthlessness of people accustomed to unnecessary death of living creatures. Again, I would like to stress, that the purpose of taxation is not to ban meat, which would be inhuman to carnivores that need meat to survive, but it seeks to reduce the unnecessary killing of animals and the follow-up consumption.  

Vegetarian.cz: Could you explain the positive economic meat tax implications on the lives of our society?  

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D:

Today's capitalist economy is based solely on personal profit, when people seek to preserve and to ensure only their life or the life of their relatives or friends in the natural struggle for life, not as much as possible the life of all people, indeed all living creatures.

A capitalist economy is based on the assumption of sustained economic growth. Economic growth based solely on the personal benefit of individual or the group of individuals near to him or her, but it has always its ceiling when these individuals no longer buy consumer goods, either out of fear of the future, or simply because they filled their personal economic needs (emotional needs are inexhaustible) and they do not have to increase their consumption.

On the further economic growth, however, banks provide and provided in advance to entrepreneurs and State loans if in the past in history the economic growth had not taken place, banks began to fail, they came the crisis, State debts, a large inflation (i.e., devaluation of money), failed enterprises, high unemployment, widespread poverty, or national monetary reform, or armament, war and drift towards war (see Black Friday on the New York Stock Exchange, the Great Depression in the 30s, the advent of fascism in Germany, Italy, Japan, etc. and the outbreak of WW2).

Dealing with these recurring problems in the capitalist economy I see to focus people not only on personal gain but to the greatest possible saving and sustaining lives of all people and then all living creatures, whose economic needs are almost endless, they do not have their ceiling and therefore one can count on sustained economic growth.

Vegetarian.cz: How would it work in real life?

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: From the above perspective the meat tax should be seen as a growth - economic measure aimed at preventing recurrent crises of capitalist economy, provided that the meat tax revenue will be used in the form of State grants (i.e. subsidies) to farmers and other entrepreneurs affected by the restriction of the livestock production for the purpose of its conversion to crop production and sales of vegetable products and breeding of animals for animals carrions (cadavers), which were not intentionally killed by any human and therefore died on principle of old age, so these carrions (cadavers) could be produced under medical supervision in compliance with applicable laws against animal abuse in a large by agricultural factory farms.

Market surplus of crop food and above mentioned animal food would be redeemed by State from the funds obtained by collecting a meat tax and free of charge or at a special price they would be supplied to developing countries and their own people (i.e. homeless) who suffer from hunger. Existing agricultural production in the developed Western world would be able to supply plant food together with their own people, and even their own homeless, also throughout the hungry developing world, because intensive "livestock production" requires approximately 25 times more land to produce the food unit compared with that, when the same unit of food is obtained from plant sources. (Fr. John Dear, S.J. Cesta za Ježíšovým nenásilím, vegetarian.cz, see : http://www.vegetarian.cz/ostatni/cesta%20za%20jesusv5.html ). According to the United Nations every day in the world approximately 60 thousand people, mostly women and children die as a result of starvation and related diseases. (Fr. John Dear, S.J. Cesta za Ježíšovým nenásilím, vegetarian.cz, see: http://www.vegetarian.cz/ostatni/cesta%20za%20jesusv1.html%20 )

(author’s correction of two previous paragraphs of the text was done on 26/01/2012)

Vegetarian.cz: Do you think that money from the tax may outweigh pain and suffering?

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: Thanks to meat tax the existing jobs would be not only maintained in the Western world, but there would be a sustained increase in employment in these countries and their continued economic growth without crises and wars. At the same time a man consuming meat and animal products would be morally justified before the own conscience and before the society and also because the collected meat tax would serve to save the lives of hungry people. And while people have learned to appreciate life and to save other living creatures and to take the real and legal responsibility to all people and to other living creatures.

Vegetarian.cz: Do you have a message for our readers? Can they actively participate in some way, if they would like to support you?

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: If they want to write me about the meat tax, they can do so at ak-gruza@seznam.cz

To readers of Vegetarian.cz and to all of us I wish for Christmas and New Year 2010 to live in a world, where is less death and pain than in the world in 2009.

Vegetarian.cz: Thank you for the interview and we join to your wish:-)

REDACTION http://www.vegetarian.cz/rozhovor/dgmdan1.html

6. Interview: Meat tax - change of name to the slaughter tax

Vegetarian. cz: We would like to ask about continuation of your activity with "so-called" meat tax?

...

My original intention has been confirmed that it is not possible to work on this bill with only vegetarians, who are a minority in Czech society, one must turn to non - vegetarians, take into account the opinion of opponents of vegetarianism, that the complete lack of meat can damage health of some individuals.

Therefore in my opinion it is to proceed with slaughter (meat) tax as in the case of medicine, therefore, it is to reduce the consumption of food from killed animals by successive legislative steps, that, if the concerns of opponents of the negative impact of vegetarianism on the health of our population do not acknowledge, it is possible gradually to increase slaughter tax rates up to a level which will result in the complete exclusion of food from killed animals. A similar procedure is in testing a new drug in medicine, when the new drug is first tested on a small group of volunteers, then extensive studies are carried out, then eventually it is registered as a new drug for the general population, but one still monitors its adverse effects on human health. Vegetarianism I personally consider such a remedy for moral, health and environmental problems of our society (see my previous Interviews on the slaughter tax).

Therefore I formulated on the basis of received comments the specific Bill and the Explanatory Memorandum of the Act on slaughter tax, which is based on the Danish Act No. 616 from 30 June 1994 concerning the taxation of chocolate and sweets, etc. (i.e. unhealthy foods), as amended (see in particular www.retsinformation.dk, a certified translation from Danish was available) in respect to the fact, that I did not consider as taxable goods the chocolate etc., but the goods from the killed animals. Next I drew up the English translation of the draft of Act on slaughter (meat) tax and of initial interviews to this Act.

Vegetarian.cz: Why did you modify the name and what are your reasons for doing so?

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: Here are three reasons. The first one - it is probably not possible to pay the slaughter (meat) tax for each sale of meat from the slaughterhouse, wholesaler, retailer to the final customer as in the case of VAT, but one must use the concept of consumer tax. The obligation to pay the tax will exist only if the first sale after the slaughter of the animal, so slaughter tax. Second, the subject of the slaughter (meat) tax will not be only meat but all the goods from the killed animals, with the exception of registered medicines for sale in pharmacies, so the slaughter tax. I also responded to the possible evolution of current scientific knowledge, which may be able to grow any artificial meat without the slaughter and suffering of animals, the subject of the slaughter tax will be only meat and other goods from slaughtered animals, not such artificial flesh (currently so-called fetal calf serum is most often used for the production of synthetic meat, for which production it is necessary to kill a cow, there are non - animal feed of tissue cultures, which is very expensive, see http://3pol.cz/1101/print ).

Vegetarian.cz: Why have you chosen to support the tax through the form of petition and other means of support for your Act have you excluded?

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: I realize to convince people about the need to go the way of the slaughter tax as a long-term question, it's run for the long haul. And as in the case of consumers of meat and in the case of vegetarians, such as politicians-vegetarians in the Green Party, who have to worry about their constituents, most of them eat conventionally. Even among vegetarians - the politicians of the Green Party it is considered, that we should wait with this project until after the parliamentary and municipal elections, and then we'll see. The problem is that by me established the Act on slaughter tax has no financial or other benefit for any lobby group, the real benefit from it just the animals will have, of which killing and suffering will be gradually avoided. Animals do not have the right to vote and one cannot count their votes in the election. Politicians today are not used to promote and to defend the altruistic laws, bringing benefits in long term and which do not present for their constituents material benefit in the short term, but rather the material disadvantages. So I have decided as a first step for the form of a petition, to check whether a substantial proportion of people are willing to do something for animals without personal gain in short term.

...

http://www.vegetarian.cz/rozhovor/dgmdan3.html

7. Vegetarian.cz presents: 

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D. 

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D. was born in Hustopeče near Brno in the Czech Republic in 1973. Graduated from high school mathematical class there at the Captain Jaroše Avenue and the Law Faculty of Charles University in Prague, where he earned a Master of Arts.

He also completed post-doctoral studies at the same university, where he received degrees Ph.D. and Doctor of Laws JUDr. The topic of his dissertation and doctoral thesis was "The use of foreign law in private international law”. Since 2002, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D. is an attorney at law firm based in Hustopeče near Brno registered in the list of Czech Bar Association.

With vegetarianism he started several times, since 2008 I am on principle the sole fruitarian (i.e. eating only plant fruits and plant seeds), in dire need I am ovo-lacto vegetarian and in dire need I eat the corpses of animals that has not been intentionally killed by any human, after the veterinarian autopsy and boiled in several waters. His interests include philosophy, law and politics. In 2009 he published a book of Philosophy of Balance (Harmony). He speaks English, French, Italian, German, Russian and Hebrew at the conversational level.

He has a shelter for chickens and a dog from a shelter, in which they named him Buddy (or "Bad" i.e. in English poor) and who I renamed "Gud" (see English good, i.e. in Czech dobrý or in English God, i.e. in Czech Bůh), who I try to feed according to the above mentioned principle of permanent causing the least possible death and pain of other living creatures, from the cadavers of animals on principle only the cadavers of animals intentionally not killed by any human, i.e. they died of old age, after the autopsy by a veterinarian. 

REDACTION http://www.vegetarian.cz/predstav/dgruza.html

 

 

 

A PETITION NECESSARY FOR THE FORMATION OF THE POLITICAL PARTY:

Please sign the Petition required for the formation of a political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures, so that all living creatures have in our society equitable rights recognized by the laws of the State.


(The signature under the Petition does not imply membership in the Party.)

   
This can be made at the seat of the Party in an official time or by filling out the below online form in your mail client on http://www.spvzt.cz/Peticezavznikstrany.html, then we will send you by e-mail the completed petition sheet with your data, which printed out (preferably on recycled paper) and signed please send via post to my address shown below ,  or send
straight via post the printed out (preferably on recycled paper) and signed petition sheet referred to here in the format: pdf and doc on http://www.spvzt.cz/Peticezavznikstrany.html to JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.d., Dobrovského 56/7, 693 01 Hustopeče.

 

1) The seat of the Party:

 

Dobrovského 56/7, 693 01 Hustopeče (The house is not far from the central square, in which the first Czechoslovak President T.G. Masaryk lived in the years 1861-1863) - MAP

 

Official hours: after telephone arrangement

 

tel. 00420 534 008 871, tel. 00420 606 302 812

e-mail zakladatel@spvzt.cz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------------------PETITION,-----------------

-to form the political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures-

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------www.spvzt.cz--------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------We cannot survive without cadavers of animals!---------------------
------------------------------------
We want only the merciful organic meat--------------------------
--------------- Slaughter factory farming are animal concentration camps!-------------
---------
The slaughter tax contributes to the change of factory farming to organic farming. -------
--------------------------
The slaughter tax will help people in dire need.---------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Hustopeče 18/12/2012. For petition the founder: JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.-attorney at law  with seat Mírová 4,69301 Hustopeče, branch: Svat. Čecha 5, 69301 Hustopeče, tel. 534008871, cell 606302812--------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with this petition and I declare, that I am the citizen of Czech Republic 18 years old: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Complete name:------Date of Birth:--- Complete permanent address:-------------------------- Signature:------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain GRATIS trade designation of rightness:

"THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS"

 

(Czech: NEJMILOSRDNĚJŠÍ PRODUKTY, Slovak: NAJMILOSRDNEJŠÍ PRODUKTY, Spanish: LOS PRODUCTOS MÁS MISERICORDIOSOS, French: LES PRODUITS LES PLUS MISÉRICORDIEUX, Russian: наиболее милостивые продукты, German: DIE BARMHERZIGSTEN PRODUKTE, Italian: I PRODOTTI PIÙ MISERICORDIOSI,מוצרים הרחומים ביותר: Hebrew)

 

j1 j2j3

j4 j5 j6 

 

 

1. The award-won most merciful products-a list see:

(list in Czech in format: doc www.spvzt.cz/Seznam.doc and pdf www.spvzt.cz/Seznam.pdf  )

( vlajka list in English in format: doc www.spvzt.cz/List.doc and pdf www.spvzt.cz/List.pdf )

1.1 Cadavers dying naturally, principally of the old age, from home poultry farms for diet of the dogs or cats, possibly human

 

This food mercy (i.e. symbiosis) may be based on the breeding of broiler chickens to their natural death of old age, virtually their most common heart attack, which occurs when the outdoor breeding in a chicken coop in their age on average 2-3 years, whereas, broiler chickens are hard race and broilers are originally bred to life with a length of approximately 30 days until their slaughter for meat. We feed broilers grain grown without herbicides and pesticides, as well as dried organic alfalfa, which naturally includes dried insects and fresh grass. After the broiler has died, it is necessary to perform its autopsy by veterinarian, in order to determine whether it did not die of some contagious illness, especially of a bacterial or viral infection. Then it is necessary to freeze a broiler and to calculate the minimum quantity of this carrion of an animal that will be necessary for the healthy nutrition of a particular dog or cat. This is done in such a way that we feed dog or cat with diet free from the corpses of animals i.e. the eggs and milk, both are the best from home breed, and in my experience the best purely vegetarian organic feed is yarrah for dog or purely vegetarian feed ami cat for cats (in my experience a dog or cat will not survive only on a purely vegetarian feed ami cat or yarrah for dogs, although the manufacturer states that it is a complete feed, during the exclusive long-term use of the purely vegetarian feed ami dog my dog vomited permanently the yellow water), that according to my experience animals like to eat and we watch occurrence of the symptoms of allergic reactions of the animals to this feed. Symptoms of an allergic reaction to this feed are vomiting, diarrhea, or scratching of a dog or a cat, after occurrence of allergic reaction of this dog or cat we feed immediately 200 grams of frozen carrion of an animal, which we will cut with a meat cleaver from frozen carrion of the animal. Then again, all of the steps of above diet of a dog or a cat without dead animals only with the aforementioned eggs and milk and the feed yarrah for dog or ami cat for cat and when above mentioned allergic reactions appear we determine the number of days the animal survives with 200 grams of a carrion of an animal, and we calculate by dividing the 200 grams of carrion of animal with this number of days a minimum quantity of a carrion of an animal which we have to give a cat or dog for above mentioned feeding without the dead animals that the cat or dog stays healthy. At the same time, even if we adhere to this minimum amount of carrions of animals, so when the above allergic reactions appear at a dog or a cat we must feed them additional large quantity of this animal carrion not to endanger the dog or cat a life dangerous allergic shock. The most dangerous threat of death of nutritional inadequacy, when the above vegetarian feed of a dog or a cat, basically, if we do not apply correctly the above steps, is physical-motor problems of a dog or a cat, at their occurrence a vet has to always be found immediately, who typically applies to an animal injected vitamins from corpses of animals and the standard diet should be recovered for a period of convalescence of the animal (i.e. meat canned) of a dog or a cat. Perhaps for animals it is unnecessary, but for humans necessary to boil the carrions of animals in several waters. To the human with the allergy with long-term ovo-lacto vegetarian diet for details see http://www.spvzt.cz/SPVZTbooklet.html#7 .


The above steps of merciful feeding I apply with the success for myself and also already 4 years for my dog (up to 07/2013 purely vegetarian feed ami dog), that in 2013 reaches the age of 7 years, which needs in the aforementioned vegetarian lacto-ovo feeding method according to the above calculation, when its weight approximately 10 kg, at least 10 grams of a carrion of an animal per day (that is, when for example I will give it 120 grams of animal carrion, it lasts for a maximum of 12 days) and which I regularly do a complete blood analysis at the vet also, according to the latest complete blood analysis of my dog at the vet from 20.2.2013 my dog is in this diet completely healthy (that is, it has all the blood values OK).


Literature: http://www.amipetfood.com/ , http://www.spvzt.cz/ ,
http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/ , http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/  , http://www.yarrah-bio.cz/content/1-psi

 

1.2 Plant fertilizer made only from meat and bone meal from cadavers of naturally died, i.e. not slaughtered animals

 

This plant fertilizer is produced from boiled animal by-products of a glue factory so called of 2nd category (basically of naturally died, i.e. not slaughtered animals) - meat and bone meal. In addition it is possible to make additional veterinary test of microbial cultivation of the presence of bacteria in the fertilizer preferably in a private veterinary laboratory. The feeding of fertilizer from carcasses to dogs and cats is prohibited by the law, in particular because of pressure from the European Union, although in 2003 in the Czech Republic this meat and bone meal was fed to livestock. Sales of that fertilizer are strictly regulated by the State and strictly veterinary controlled. In the Czech Republic this fertilizer is sold in the minimum amount of 50 kilograms for example by the company ASAP ltd. (see http://www.asap.cz/ ), tel. 00420 569 408 111, 582 56 Věž No. 145, Havlíčkův Brod District, Vysočina Region, Czech Republic, but only to registered farmers or entrepreneurs with businesses justifying the sale of fertilizers.

 

Literature: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kafil%C3%A9rie ,  http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/kadaver.aspx , http://www.mechanizacezemedelstvi.cz/zivocisna-vyroba/Masokostni-moucka-z-kadaveru-zakazana__s45x12794.html

 

1.3 Potatoes from symbiotic agriculture


Potatoes grown in symbiotic agriculture, which does not intervene against their pests with the exception of their excessive reproduction. See Symbiotic agriculture and experiments of natural science proving Philosophy of Balance on: http://www.spvzt.cz/symbioticagriculture.htm .

 

 

 

2. The statute of the association - introduction


THE ASSOCIATION FOR POSSIBLY THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS OF THE ECONOMY

 

(Czech: SPOLEK ZA CO MOŽNÁ NEJMILOSRDNĚJŠÍ PRODUKTY EKONOMIKY,

Slovak: SPOLOK ZA ČO MOŽNÁ NAJMILOSRDNEJŠÍ PRODUKTY EKONOMIKY,

Spanish: ASOCIACIÓN PARA LOS PRODUCTOS POSIBLEMENTE MÁS MISERICORDIOSOS DE ECONOMÍA,

French: ASSOCIATION POUR LES PRODUITS LES PLUS MISÉRICORDIEUX POSSIBLEMENT DE L ' ÉCONOMIE,

Russian: Ассоциация для по возможности наиболее милостивых продуктов экономики,

German: VEREINIGUNG FÜR MÖGLICHERWEISE DIE BARMHERZIGSTEN PRODUKTE DER WIRTSCHAFT,

Italian: ASSOCIAZIONE PER I PRODOTTI POSSIBILMENTE PIÙ MISERICORDIOSI DI ECONOMIA,

האגודה למוצרים אולי הרחומים ביותר של הכלכלה: Hebrew)

 

Registration number (IČO): 60680784

(further also as statute)

 

„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain."All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

„31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day." The Bible, Genesis. 1,31

This is a way to restore the world's paradise on Earth, the Jews, virtually Jewish cabbala would say, to liberate the divine light, representing everything live from capture of klippot, i.e. teguments of evil:

 

29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. The Bible, Genesis 1,29-30

(Ten Commandments:) "Thou shalt not kill." The Bible, Exodus 20,13 and Deuteronomy 5,17:

In my opinion the aim is the harmony of everyone and everything, this means of all living creatures (all animals, plants, fungi, living cells, bacteria, viruses, machines conscious of itself, etc.), in the future (by evolution) they could become friends for life and death. In my opinion the paradise on Earth requires us to kill other living creatures only when strictly necessary, not to kill them too many, which is the only requirement for achieving a paradise on Earth. I regard it as a self-evident truth, that “Those who have the strongest desire to achieve a world of universal love in the shortest possible time (i.e. to achieve paradise for all living things) should inflict the minimum possible death and pain (especially to all living creatures). Deciding, according to the “Philosophy of Balance, whether it is fairer for a merciful animal or an equally merciful human to die, represents an infinitely complex problem, which can only be solved by nature, or God working through it. Our descendants should thus continue in the education (i.e. evolution) of all living, often legally irresponsible creatures, such as animals, in order to help them fulfill their permanent obligation to inflict as little death and pain as possible.

...

 

 

3. The statute of the association – rules for wining award of the most merciful products

Article 21

 

[Rights and duties of the Commission] (1) The Commission is authorized and required to decide to grant or to refuse or to withdraw the designation of the appropriate economic product:

 THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS …

or its translation into the language of the territory in which the designation will be used, and on the basis of proof or evidence that in each stage of production of the product for this designation was not caused more unnecessary death and pain, i.e. almost only the necessary death and pain have been caused, that is almost as small as possible death and pain. A mayor is entitled to make the selection of economic product and to suggest the designation from their own volition or on the initiative of a third party. As already mentioned, the Commission proposes the Mayor to remove or to appoint a Commissioner, it shall be entitled to inspect all the economy of Association.

(2) The Commissioners shall be required to comply with the Commission decision regarding the selected economic product, to check the conditions for granting the above designation of economic product, they are obliged to care for the reputation of the Association.

 

...

 

Full text of the statute of above association in Czech in format:

doc ( http://www.spvzt.cz/stanovysdr.doc ) and pdf ( http://www.spvzt.cz/stanovysdr.pdf ).

© 2013-2016 applies to this entire article: Gain GRATIS trade designation of rightness: "THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact:      

sidlo

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., founder,

Tel. 00420 606302812

 

1) Seat:

 

Dobrovského 56/7, 693 01 Hustopeče (The house is not far from the central square, in which the first Czechoslovak President T.G. Masaryk lived in the years 1861-1863) - MAP

 

Official hours: after telephone arrangement

 

Tel. 00420 534 008 871, Tel. 00420 606 302 812

 

web site: www.spvzt.cz e-mail: zakladatel@spvzt.cz

 

2) Cooperating with Attorney, JUDr. Dalibor Grůzou Ph.D.:

 

Branch: Sv. Čecha 5, 693 01 Hustopeče- MAP

 

Tel. 00420 534 008 871, fax: 00420 519 413 392, cell phone 00420 606 302 812,

skype on line: daliborgruza

 

web site: www.czechlawfirm.com , e-mail: ak-gruza@seznam.cz

 Useful links:

The World Food Program of the United Nations  http://www.wfp.org/

Czech Committee for UNICEF of the United Nations  http://www.unicef.cz/

Doctors Without Borders  http://www.lekari-bez-hranic.cz/

The Salvation Army  http://www.armadaspasy.cz/

 

ohz - protectors of farm animals, o.s. http://www.ohz.cz/

Farm Krishna court  http://www.krisnuvdvur.cz/

Society for the animals  http://www.spolecnostprozvirata.cz/

 

Snakes http://www.chovamehady.cz/

Beasts http://www.selmy.cz/

Club of falconers of Czech-Moravian hunting unity  http://www.sokolnictvi.net/

Czech-Moravian hunting unity http://www.cmmj.cz/

 

Natura 2000 http://www.nature.cz/natura2000-design3/hp.php

Flora Olomouc exhibition grounds, a.s. http://www.flora-ol.cz/

Trees in the Czech Republic - The association Quercus http://www.stromy.cz/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philosophy of Balance or ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY as biblical paradise in the world for all living creatures by our own forces as commentary on Bible, Genesis, chapter 1-4

Genesis 1-4:26

King James Version (KJV)

 

1

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.

14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.

23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.

24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.

31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

 

1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.

And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,

And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.

But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.

And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.

11 The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;

12 And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone.

13 And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.

14 And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.

15 And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.

16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:

17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

18 And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

19 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.

20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.

21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

 

1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

And they heard the voice of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden.

And the Lord God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?

10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.

11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?

12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.

13 And the Lord God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;

18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;

19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins, and clothed them.

22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

 

1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.

And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper (of sheep), but Cain was a tiller of the ground.

And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord.

And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering:

But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.

And the Lord said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?

If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.

And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.

And the Lord said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?

10 And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground.

11 And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand;

12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.

13 And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear.

14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.

15 And the Lord said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

16 And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.

17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.

18 And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech.

19 And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah.

20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle.

21 And his brother's name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ.

22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah.

23 And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.

24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.

25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.

26 And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the Lord.

 

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%201:1-4:26&version=KJV